[Eg-oversight-board] before next board meeting

[rogan at roganhamby.com]

While not perfect I think it's a good approach and might serve us with some slight modifications.

May 30, 2013 05:25:38 PM, gmc at esilibrary.com wrote:
Hi,
>
>On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Andrea Buntz Neiman
>aneiman at kent.lib.md.us> wrote:
>> With all due respect, the Contributor page on the wiki is very densely
>> wall-of-text and dev-focused.   Librarians are by nature helpful people who
>> like ferreting out information, but there's this sense that I get from this
>> page that things like bug reporting and documentation are solely the domain
>> of people who know the code.  I understand why knowing the code is good in
>> these cases, but is it necessary?  I would very much like to bridge the gap
>> between "I want to get involved but I couldn't code if my life depended on
>> it" and "Here's what the project needs that can be done knowing no code",
>> since that is the gap in which I frequently find myself w/r/t the project
>> (and based on conversations with others I'm not alone in this gap).
>
>To toss out a point of comparison, what do you think of Koha's version?
>
>http://koha-community.org/get-involved/
>
>Regards,
>
>Galen
>--
>Galen Charlton
>Manager of Implementation
>Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
>email:  gmc at esilibrary.com
>direct: +1 770-709-5581
>cell:   +1 404-984-4366
>skype:  gmcharlt
>web:    http://www.esilibrary.com/
>Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org &
>http://evergreen-ils.org
>_______________________________________________
>eg-oversight-board mailing list
>eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org
>http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eg-oversight-board
>