[Eg-oversight-board] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Code of conduct for Evergreen events

[Chauncey Montgomery]

I can see how definitions would be good.  Looks clear to me.
CM

On 04/16/2014 12:33 PM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm forwarding along some feedback from the SFC that we received on the
> proposed code of conduct.
>
> Kathy
>
> Kathy Lussier
> Project Coordinator
> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
> (508) 343-0128
> klussier at masslnc.org
> Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: Fwd: Code of conduct for Evergreen events
> Date: 	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:57:48 -0400
> From: 	Tony Sebro <tony at sfconservancy.org>
> To: 	Kathy Lussier <klussier at masslnc.org>
> CC: 	bkuhn at sfconservancy.org <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org>, Ben Hyman
> <ben.hyman at bc.libraries.coop>
>
>
>
> On 04/16/2014 11:46 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
>> Did you have an opportunity to review the below policy that Galen sent
>> along last month?
>>
> Hi, Kathy.
>
> I'm fine with the policy as-is.  However, I do like the definition of
> "harassment" used in the OpenStack Summit Code of Conduct [1], which was
> in turn based on the PyCon Code of Conduct:
>>
>>
>>     What Constitutes Harassment
>>
>>   * Violent threats, intimidation or personal insults directed against
>>     another person
>>   * Verbal, graphic or written comments related to gender, sexual
>>     orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race or
>>     religion
>>   * Posting sexually explicit or violent material
>>   * Stalking or following, including harassing photography or recording
>>   * Sustained disruption of talks or other presentations
>>   * Inappropriate physical contact or sexual attention
>>   * Posting (or threatening to post) other people's personally
>>     identifying information
>>   * Advocating for, or encouraging, any of the above behavior
>>   * Repeated harassment of others. In general, if someone asks you to
>>     stop, then stop
>>
> I recommend incorporating that definition into the Evergreen Event Code
> of Conduct.  It's available for use under a CC By license. But, if the
> EOB doesn't want that level of specificity with respect to defining
> "harrassment," I'm fine with approving the code of conduct as-written.
>
> Best, -Tony
>
> [1]
> http://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/the-openstack-summit-code-of-conduct/
>
>
> --
> Tony Sebro, General Counsel, Software Freedom Conservancy
> +1-212-461-3245 x11
> tony at sfconservancy.org
> www.sfconservancy.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eg-oversight-board mailing list
> eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eg-oversight-board
>