<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Thanks all!<br>
<br>
I'll go with this committee makeup then and see if I can find reps
from each group. Steve, I wouldn't consider it a showstopper if we
don't get the requisite number of reps from each category, but I'm
optimistic that we'll be fine.<br>
<br>
Thanks!<br>
Kathy<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:klussier@masslnc.org">klussier@masslnc.org</a>
Twitter: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier">http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier</a>
</pre>
On 10/31/2013 2:01 PM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:swills@beyond-print.com">swills@beyond-print.com</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:2117841439.353874.1383242494263.JavaMail.vpopmail@mail.beyond-print.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div>
<div> This isn't a topic I know very much about. My unqualified
opinion is that this sounds reasonable. My concern is the
same one I have in everything I am currently involved in; a
small pool of volunteers who risk becoming burnt out. As long
as a lack in any category isn't a show stopper, pun intended,
it sounds like a great suggestion. </div>
<div> </div>
Steve </div>
<div> <br>
On October 29, 2013 at 12:56 PM Kathy Lussier
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:klussier@masslnc.org"><klussier@masslnc.org></a> wrote: </div>
<div style="position: relative;">
<blockquote style="margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 10px;
border-left: solid 1px blue;" type="cite"> Hi all, <br>
<br>
I didn't receive any feedback on this next month, so I'm just
going to throw out a suggested makeup for a site selection
committee. <br>
<br>
- 1 rep from each of the past three conferences. I know Amy is
willing to help if we want a rep from this year's planning
team to be included in that count of three, but if you all
think it's better to just have people who have been through
the entire conference process, then we're willing to step back
and hand it over to people from the 2011-2013 teams <br>
- 1 rep from the Board <br>
- 2 at-large members from the community <br>
- 1 vendor rep <br>
<br>
Does this sound reasonable to everyone? Does anyone have
another idea? <br>
<br>
<br>
If so, I can put out a call for at-large members and a vendor
rep to the general list and then also contact people from
previous planning teams (I think most are on this list.) If we
get more volunteers than we need, I'm thinking the fairest way
to handle it is to take those who volunteer first. <br>
<br>
Let me know what you think. <br>
<br>
Also, I do want to discuss item 2 in my previous e-mail (using
the conference as a money maker versus keeping it as
affordable as possible). Galen, if we don't get much
discussion on the list, can we add it to the agenda for the
next meeting? <br>
<br>
Kathy <br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-forward-container"> <br>
<pre class="moz-signature">Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:klussier@masslnc.org">klussier@masslnc.org</a>
Twitter: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier">http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier</a>
</pre>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div> </div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>