[Evergreen-acq] Anyone Using Coutts as Vendor With EDI?

[Jane Sandberg]

Hi Jennifer,

We use Coutts as our primary vendor.  We didn't mess with the PO JEDI
templates, but there were a few other configuration pieces we needed
to do:
* One weird piece was that we had to leave the Vendor Account Number
blank and put our SAN into the Vendor Assigned Code field on the EDI
Accounts screen.
* Another weird piece was that by default, they send our SAN in EDI
Invoices followed by ::92, which Evergreen didn't recognize properly.
Coutts was very accommodating at changing their invoices so that our
SAN was followed by ::31B instead.
* Coutts uses a lot more EDI order statuses than Evergreen does.  We
reported this as a bug with Evergreen:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1770202

BTW, we're not using EDI Attributes.

   -Jane

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:16 PM Jennifer Pringle
<jennifer.pringle at bc.libraries.coop> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone currently using EDI with ProQuest Coutts and willing to
> share their configuration?
>
> Coutts isn't one of the libraries included in the PO JEDI template by default.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jennifer
> --
> Jennifer Pringle
> Co-op Support
> BC Libraries Cooperative
> Tel: 1-888-848-9250
> Email:jennifer.pringle at bc.libraries.coop
> Website: http://bc.libraries.coop
>
> Gratefully acknowledging that I live and work in the unceded
> Traditional Territory of the St'at'yemc Nations.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-acq mailing list
> Evergreen-acq at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-acq



-- 
Jane Sandberg
Electronic Resources Librarian
Linn-Benton Community College
sandbej at linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655
Pronouns: she/her/hers