<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Garamond;
panose-1:2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 8 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>At the Cataloging Working Group, we discussed development for RDA. The consensus of opinion was that the development we really need at this point is relatively minor. Default display for the 264 and search indexing for the 3xx fields were the specific things we identified. Given that the new Bibframe is still under development by LC and its partners and may require extensive development, the group felt much more development for RDA would not be productive. We would prefer to concentrate any development efforts we might be able to cobble together toward improvements in the cataloging interface and in authorities. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>We discussed establishing a cataloging wiki page similar to the authorities page Yamil developed (<a href="http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=authorities">http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=authorities</a>). <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>How does this sound to everyone? Is there something else you feel needs to be developed specifically for RDA? <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>If anyone else at the meeting has anything else to add?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><i><span style='font-size:18.0pt;font-family:"Garamond","serif"'>Elaine</span></i><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><o:p></o:p></span></p><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><hr size=2 width="100%" align=center></span></div></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><br>J. Elaine Hardy<br>PINES Bibliographic Projects & Metadata Manager<br>Georgia Public Library Service<br>1800 Century Place, Ste 150<br>Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304<br><br>404.235-7128<br>404.235-7201, fax<br>ehardy@georgialibraries.org<br>www.georgialibraries.org<br><a href="http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines"><span style='color:blue'>www.georgialibraries.org/pines</span></a><br><br><br></span><o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>