[Evergreen-dev] Recommendations for Postgresql version for EG3.9 and 3.10?

[Robin H. Johnson]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 02:03:21PM -0500, Jason Stephenson via Evergreen-dev wrote:
> > Maybe 11, but then that just gains me a year of bug fixes since PG 11 
> > will be out of support Nov 2023.  PG 14 would give me 4 years of 
> > support, but I don't know if it has been tested enough.
> 
> I've been using Pg 14 for all of my development and testing VMs with 
> Concerto for the past year with no real issues.  I also ran Pg 14 as my 
> main test instance with production data for a few months, again without 
> any noticeable issues.
> 
> I suggest giving Pg 14 a try in production. It's the only way that we're 
> really going to find all of the issues and someone has to go first.
> 
> I don't recommend Pg 11 through 13. While they have fewer changes, they 
> are also less well tested as far as I know.
> 
> I am working on getting Pg 15 compatibility going. In fact, I just ran 
> build-db.sh on Pg 15 to see what blows up.
Hi Jason,

I didn't see any results on your Pg 15 testing here.
Can you share with the list your results for Pg15+EG3.10 together?

(Also if extended testing on Pg14 revealed any other issues).

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
GnuPG FP   : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1113 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-dev/attachments/20230314/e895d013/attachment.sig>