[Evergreen-governance-l] FW: Be sure to do this

[Amy Terlaga]

Jeez, I don't know. One of the problems we're having is the whole conference issue.  Since we don't know yet if the foundation will be handling financial responsibility for the conferences, the dues issue is still a question mark I guess.  

But if the foundation does take on the conference stuff, I'd feel better about having dues. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 1, 2010, at 2:41 PM, "Watson, Sylvia" <sywatson at library.IN.gov> wrote:

> So, is the general consensus that I need to remove the clause on dues altogether, or require 2/3 vote of the board or require membership vote?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sylvia
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Galen Charlton [mailto:gmc at esilibrary.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 2:28 PM
> To: Watson, Sylvia
> Cc: Lori Bowen Ayre; Williamson, Cynthia; evergreen-governance-l at list.georgialibraries.org
> Subject: Re: [Evergreen-governance-l] FW: Be sure to do this
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Watson, Sylvia wrote:
>> Just as an FYI, I added a sentence that provides that membership is determined by majority vote of all submitted member responses.  That way, if half the members don't respond, the proposed member is not denied because of a lack of majority vote of the membership.  
> 
> I am in favor of this change.
> 
>> This is assuming we keep the members in charge of approving memberships, an issue that I understand may not be resolved. 
> 
> I am in favor of having members approve membership.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Galen
> --
> Galen Charlton
> VP, Data Services
> Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
> email:  gmc at esilibrary.com
> direct: +1 352-215-7548
> skype:  gmcharlt
> web:    http://www.esilibrary.com/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-governance-l mailing list
> Evergreen-governance-l at list.georgialibraries.org
> http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-governance-l