[evergreen-outreach] Proper attribution for community photos

[Kathy Lussier]

Thanks Rogan! It makes sense to be consistent.

Kathy

On Sat, Apr 15, 2023, 11:18 PM <rogan.hamby at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would say CC-BY SA 3.0.  The content created for the annual report is
> currently published under that and has been so it is precdent.  It does
> make me think we may want to update that next year to the 4.0 though.
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 3:28 PM Kathy Lussier via evergreen-outreach <
> evergreen-outreach at list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon Outreach Committee!
>>
>> I don't know the best place to ask this question, so I'll start with the
>> knowledgeable folks on this list. In my conference presentation, I plan to
>> incorporate some of the conference and hack-a-way photos that have been
>> posted to Evergreen social media sites, but only those that have been
>> posted since the adoption of the community photography policy. I have also
>> used a few of these in recent blog posts. Although people have already
>> provided some form of permission through the use of lanyards at these
>> events, I plan to reach out to folks to allow an opt out just to be sure
>> they're comfortable with the use of these photos in my talk.
>>
>> My question is about the proper attribution for these photos. According
>> to the photography policy, "If the Evergreen Project Board, or the
>> Evergreen Conference Planning Committee chooses to publish photographs and
>> recordings taken by event staff, we will publish them under a Creative
>> Commons license."
>>
>> I am very disappointed in the vague language that the original author
>> used here and think the only recourse is to ensure that person never
>> attends another Evergreen social event, particularly those involving
>> karaoke.
>>
>> In any case, which Creative Commons license should I use here? Would it
>> be safe to assume that we're talking about CC BY-SA since it most closely
>> resembles  GNU GPL? If so, would it be 2.0 or 4.0? Or should we not assume?
>> Should the community update the policy to be a little clearer on this point?
>>
>> Kathy
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kathy Lussier
>> she/her/hers
>> https://kmlussier.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> evergreen-outreach mailing list
>> evergreen-outreach at list.evergreen-ils.org
>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-outreach
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-outreach/attachments/20230416/d77c4229/attachment.htm>