[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Gentoo ebuild 20070215

[Don McMorris]

On 2/22/07, Eric Lesage <lesagee at iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Don McMorris wrote:
>
> > This is mostly for ELesage, but I'm sure it's relevant to others.
> >
> > I'm working on installing Evergreen inside a Gentoo VM.  I'm taking
> > the opportunity to test the ebuild developed by Mr. Lesage
> > (openils-portage-20070215.tar.gz ).
> >
> > I've run into trouble installing (via CPAN) DateTime::Format::ISO8601.
> > The issue I've had seems to have been widely experienced by CPAN
> > testers.
>
> BTW, if you check the ebuild comments of :ISO8601, you'll see that the
> tests on this ebuild are disabled due to an error in t/02_examples.... :-)
>
> I've just found there is a bug report for this on CPAN:
> http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=24335
>
> I'll see if my next release could include the suggested patch.
>
>
> > As such, I tried emerge'ing DateTime-Format-ISO8601.  I got
> > an ebuild error in DateTime-Format-Builder, regarding invalid ATOM
> >> dev-lang/perl.
>
> Indeed, there's a superfluous ">" present in the string. I'll correct this
> for my next release. It's strange that it used to work; perhaps the latest
> portage release checks more carefully.
>
> > Just so I could continue, I've removed the dev-lang/perl portion from
> > the DateTime-Format-Builder-0.78.07.ebuild.  In order for emerge to
> > continue, I had to hack the Manifest to the following:
> > EBUILD DateTime-Format-Builder-0.78.07.ebuild 737 RMD160
> [etc]
>
> For general information (maybe you knew), the command:
> ebuild ebuildwhichchanged.ebuild digest
> regenerates the Manifest for you.
I knew there HAD to be a way to do it! I just figured it'd be easier
to hack than to Google the actual command.  Thanks!

>
> My next tree should also include ebuilds for the libdbi 0.8.2(-1) released
> earlier this week. And of course I'll be updating for 1.0.2.4. I'll have
> to evaluate the requirements for 1.1 before including it in a release as
> well.
>
>
> Also take note that Email:Send is now in the official portage tree,
> altough they use a slightly different versioning scheme. I'll keep my own
> version for now, until theirs get into stable for x86 and amd64; when
> that happens, my version will automatically stop being used, anyway.
>
> > Now... onward!
>
> Thanks for your bug report!
Thanks for working on the ebuild!

>
> --
> Eric Lesage
>
--Don