[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Should we split the mailing lists?

[Don McMorris]

I think Jason's intention is to allow the developers' to have their
own "club".  I personally agree that another list may be warranted
now.

I can picture a contributor getting annoyed by tech support "calls" to
"their" list, and leaving.  Having something really for the
developers' to talk at the code-level would, IMHO, be something nice.
This (the -dev) list could remain as it is (although it's called
"dev", there's already a lot of tech support archives).

As always, keep up the good work guys!
--Don

On 5/8/07, Edward Corrado <corrado at tcnj.edu> wrote:
> Personally, I don't see a need to split the list. But, if it makes it
> easier for others (e.g. the developers), I'm OK with it. If it does split,
> I'll probably end up on both of them.
>
> Edward
>
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > There's been a lot of traffic on OPEN-ILS-DEV, and we're wondering if
> > we should try to splinter some of that off into other lists.  So we'd
> > like to get your opinions on that.
> >
> > One notion is to create an OPEN-ILS-PATCHES for patches and discussion
> > revolving around those patches, sort of an "active development" list.
> > We could then keep the install, configuration, and administration
> > questions on OPEN-ILS-DEV.
> >
> > What do you think?  Do any other divisions make sense?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Jason Etheridge
> > GPLS -- PINES Development
> > http://open-ils.org/
> >
>
>
>