[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Re: Ejabberd and Ubuntu (Dan Wells)

[Pierre Nault]

Hello Dan,

     Thanks for the infos, ejabberd is now working and listening on the 5222
port. I have registered the two accounts and it worked. But something is not
clear : you said that I have to change the ejabberd.cfg file to something
like this :
{hosts, ["localhost","your.domain.name.goes.here"]}.
 The strong characters surprised me : correct me if I'm wrong but they
equals the result of the command "hostname -d". In the documentation (
http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=installing_evergreen_on_ubuntu_7.04)
it said to change the line to something like this:

{hosts, ["localhost","eg-server"]}. eg-server would equals hostname -s
in that case.

Is there an error ? I'm a little bit confused with the use of hostname
in the documentation.
Just to be sure, this is what I get when I do these commands:

cobaye at cobaye-TI:~$ hostname -f
cobaye-TI.bib.uqam.ca

cobaye at cobaye-TI:~$ hostname -s
cobaye-TI

cobaye at cobaye-TI:~$ hostname -d
bib.uqam.ca


Thanks a lot,

Pierre Nault

Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:12:37 -0400
> From: "Dan Wells" <dbw2 at calvin.edu>
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Ejabberd and Ubuntu
> To: < open-ils-dev at list.georgialibraries.org>
> Message-ID: <470FAAFA.3669.00F7.0 at calvin.edu >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hello Pierre,
>
> >From what I see there are a couple issues at play.  First, ejabberdctl
> will
> always give the 'nodedown' message if not run with sudo.  Try 'sudo
> ejabberdctl
> status' and see if you get better results.  My guess is the server is
> running
> properly, you just don't know it yet :)  You may also want to run 'sudo
> /etc/init.d/ejabberd stop' followed by 'sudo /etc/init.d/ejabberd start'
> just
> to be extra sure.
>
> Second, the 'not allowed' message will happen if you are not using the
> same
> hostname value consistently.  In the ejabberd.cfg file you should have set
> a
> line like this:
>
> {hosts, ["localhost","your.domain.name.goes.here"]}.
>
> When you then run the 'register' command, you must use the exact same
> name,
> like this:
>
> sudo ejabberdctl register evergreen your.domain.name.goes.here everPass
>
> In other words, the third argument to ejabberdctl must be identical to
> whatever you set in the hosts setting; an equivalent name for the same
> machine
> just won't work.
>
> Please let us know if any of this helps.
>
> DW
>
> >>> "Pierre Nault" < pierrenault at gmail.com> 10/12/2007 4:27 PM >>>
> Hi everyone,
>
>    I'm a system librarian at UniversitÃ(c) du QuÃ(c)bec a MontrÃ(c)al, we're in
> the
> process of evaluating the Evergreen ILS as a possible replacement for our
> system. I'm installing Evergreen on a Ubuntu 7.04, following the
> instructions on these pages (
> http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=installing_evergreen_on_ubuntu_7.04
> )
> + the upgrade for the 1.2 release. The version of Evergreen is the release
> candidate 1.2.0. Everything went great until the step #22, precisely at
> the
> end when I register the two new accounts (evergreen, router) in ejabberd.
> I
> have this message :
> Can't register user "evergreen at cobaye-TI.bib.uqam.ca" at node '
> ejabberd at cobaye-TI': not_allowed
> I search lots of pages in Google and it seems that the ejabberd server was
>
> not working. I tried this:
> cobaye at cobaye-TI:~$ ejabberdctl status and it give me that:
> RPC failed on the node 'ejabberd at cobaye-TI': nodedown
>
> I tried to see if ejabberd was listening on ports 5222, 5223 or 5269 (like
>
> it says in the ejabberd.cfg file) with netstat : nothing was listening on
> these ports. I search in the man ejabberd and in the man ejabberdctl
> files.
> Saw that erlang was needed for ejabberd. I verified that all packages
> needed
> for erlang was there : a file was missing (erlang-x11). Restart the server
> with sudo /etc/init.d/ejabberd force-reload. Even if it said: Restarting
> jabber server: ejabberd., the server was not listening/working. The node
> ejabberd at cobaye-TI is still down.
>
> Anyone have any idea on how can I resolve this problem ?
>
> p.s. I saw that the ejabberd version in the Ubuntu distribution was the
> 1.1.2, on the ejabberd
> site< http://www.process-one.net/en/ejabberd/release_notes/>,
> there is a 1.1.4 version.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pierre Nault
> Service des bibliotheques, Technologies de l'information
> UniversitÃ(c) du QuÃ(c)bec a MontrÃ(c)al
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:44:10 -0400
> From: Bill Ott < bott at grpl.org>
> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Server loads (theoretically)
> To: open-ils-dev at list.georgialibraries.org
> Message-ID: < 4710E7CA.5010900 at grpl.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
> Should Evergreen run more efficiently with more application servers, or
> more processor power?
>
> I've got several blade servers running a test cluster (much prettier
> than my franken-cluster of months gone by).  I'm running one virtual
> brick (VMware w/ one OSRF router/gateway & 3 application servers) along
> with individual EG servers on other blades.  What I lack is enough test
> traffic to make a dent in the processing power (dual quad-core Xeons
> with 8GB RAM).
>
> From an architectural perspective, once I get some real world load,
> should I see better performance running the OS natively and having more
> raw horsepower, or having ump-teen application servers available?
>
>
>
>
>
> End of Open-ils-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 17
> ********************************************
>



-- 
What do you call a cyclist who doesn't wear a helmet?  An organ
donor.  ~David Perry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20071015/9b73f692/attachment.html