[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Reshelving Complete

[Mike Rylander]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Doug Kyle <dkyle at grpl.org> wrote:
> Mike Rylander wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Doug Kyle <dkyle at grpl.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Doug Kyle wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul Waak wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:13 AM, Mike Rylander wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [big snip]
>>>>>> So, are their any circulation-manager-type folks out there that would
>>>>>> be willing to weigh in on this?  To summarize, the options on the
>>>>>> table are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Tie reshelving-complete to the last edit time (effectively the
>>>>>> "last time we touched the copy") for copies in the Reshelving status
>>>>>> [non-circulation edits would extend the reshelving delay]
>>>>>> 2) Extend the current behavior (checkin time OR create time for new,
>>>>>> uncirculated copies) to make it aware of transits and apply the delay
>>>>>> only after a post-circulation transit is complete [more complicated,
>>>>>> and possibly slower, reshelving query]
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what plans are for this issue, but here is a patch that we
>>> are
>>> using with the current behavior to account for transit time.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, Doug!  One quick question, should the new join be a LEFT JOIN
>> for copies that have circulated but not transited?
>>
>>
>
> Indeed it should, thanks Mike.
>

I've attached a mildly reworked version of the patch which I'd love
some more eyes on.  Gimme an aye (heh) and I'll commit it.

-- 
Mike Rylander
 | VP, Research and Design
 | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts
 | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
 | email:  miker at esilibrary.com
 | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reshelv-miker.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3203 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20091110/89f3f9e6/attachment.patch