[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Improving Evergreen's OPAC Search

[Chad G. Hansen]

Is this the current development community of Evergreen? Is this even the
mailing list for those who are actively working on Evergreen?

My group is submitting a proposal for a grant that will hopefully allow us
to implement our new search technology with one of the existing open source
ILS that are being used around the world. We would like to work with
Evergreen to see if we can improve its OPAC search with ideas or features
from our own system. We are just in the proposal phase right now. Attached
is a portion of a previously rejected proposal. The section attached is our
previous design/plan section for what we would like to accomplish.

What we are looking for is an endorement by the Evergreen development
community of the idea. A willingness for someone in the development
community to possibly work with us in our attempt to potentially improve
Evergreen's search.
Our goal is to work with the development community to implement any
improvements we can and then give what we have done to the community (we
have no desire to maintain after the 3 year grant project is up).

Is this the right venue for this request?
What is the concensus from this group?
Do you need more information before commiting to endoring the idea to
possibly work with us in the future (assuming our grant is granted)?

Thanks,
Chad Hansen

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Chad G. Hansen <cgh at byu.edu> wrote:

> Thanks for your response, Mike.
>
> The design of the enhanced library search engine we would like to integrate
> with Evergreen can be found in the 2009 JASIST paper which was co-authored
> by several members of our team now. Here is the reference for that paper:
>
> Maria Soledad Pera, William Lund, and Yiu-Kai Ng, A Sophisticated Library
> Search Strategy Using Kolksonomies and Similarity Matches <
> http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~dennis/papers/EnLibS-Rev.pdf<http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/%7Edennis/papers/EnLibS-Rev.pdf>>.
> Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology
> (JASIST) Volume 60, Issue 7, pp. 1392-1406, July 2009.
>
> You can download the paper from the link and view it if you would like.
> Essentially the system uses folksonomies (tagging) to provide more relevant
> search results to the user.
>
> I would suggest reading at least the abstract of this document if you want
> to know more of what thy did.
>
> Once again is this something that the community would be interested in
> healing us do?
> Does anyone see any potential problems or issues with trying to do this
> with Evergreen?
>
> Thanks,
> Chad
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Mike Rylander <mrylander at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Chad G. Hansen <cgh at byu.edu> wrote:
>> > I am part of a team of researchers in the Brigham Young University
>> Computer
>> > Science department who are interested in improving the searching used by
>> > Evergreen's OPAC interface.
>> > Others on the team have come up with a fast and effective way to do
>> > searching using folksonomies which greatly increases relevance of
>> results
>> > and we are interested in adding that system to one of the open-source
>> > library systems out there. We are considering both Koha and Evergreen
>> for
>> > this.
>> > We would like to have the Open-ILS community's involvement as much as
>> > possible.
>> >
>> > We would like to either enhance the existing search algorithm of
>> Evergreen
>> > or replace it with our own search.
>> >
>> > We would like to know if anyone is interested in being involved with
>> this?
>> > We would also like to get any pointers on how possible and how difficult
>> > this might be for our team to do this, keeping in mind that we are
>> newish to
>> > the library specific protocols and formats (MARC, Z39.50, etc).
>> >
>>
>> We would be interested in hearing your ideas, certainly.  If you'd
>> like to share some details of your proposed algorithm, and perhaps
>> research output if your team has written any papers, that would be a
>> great first step.
>>
>> Search is a complicated beast, as is Evergreen in general, so we can't
>> really talk about replacing or integrating anything without
>> understanding what this new piece is so that we can help you consider
>> the consequences (positive or negative) that any new code may have on
>> other areas of the system.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Rylander
>>  | VP, Research and Design
>>  | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Evergreen Experts
>>  | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>>  | email:  miker at esilibrary.com
>>  | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Chad
>
> e. chansen4 at gmail.com
>
> e. cgh at byu.edu
> p. 801-477-0295
>



-- 
Thank you,
Chad

e. chansen4 at gmail.com
e. cgh at byu.edu
p. 801-477-0295
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20100112/6324804e/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: output.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 224213 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20100112/6324804e/attachment-0001.pdf