[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts

[Hardy, Elaine]

Dan -- I think it would be beneficial to allow a complete set to be 
available to be targeted for a hold placed for a specific volume. But, I don’t 
know that I would put that as a priority 1 if I were doing a requirements 
doc for this.

Mike -- lf there is still time, I will look through the req doc we are 
developing for a cataloging module and see if there is anything in it that 
might be useful for this or bound with. We put writing the doc on hiatus in 
August and am just know dusting it back off again, so I don't recall if we 
addresses these two yet.

Elaine


J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service,
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
404.235-7128
404.235-7201, fax

ehardy at georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/


-----Original Message-----
From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org 
[mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dan 
Wells
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:44 PM
To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts

Hello Mike,

Also, I think this quote from Elaine deserves a bit more attention:

>> I'm particularly interested in how this would function in a
>> consortium like PINES where different libraries might process a
>> multipart set differently. For example, one library might process and
>> circulate a 3 part DVD set as one item, where another might put each
>> in a separate container with a separate barcode.

If we want the complete-set copy from Library A to conclusively fulfill a 
P-level hold from Library B, we will want to allow multiple parts per copy. 
Or am I missing something?