[OPEN-ILS-DEV] Continuous integration - build slaves needed!
Grant Johnson
fgjohnson at upei.ca
Fri Jan 28 07:59:26 EST 2011
Dan,
UPEI can offer a VM or 2. Let me know what you need.
On 1/28/11, Dan Scott <dan at coffeecode.net> wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> To make the best use of the buildbot continuous integration server, we
> need a few different build slaves (servers) that can run the
> checkout/configure/compile/test steps and report back to the build
> master.
>
> We need different servers because we want to test:
>
> 1) different operating systems (e.g. Debian Lenny, Debian Squeeze,
> Ubuntu Lucid, RHEL 5 / CentOS 5, RHEL 6 / eventually CentOS 6, etc)
>
> 2) different combinations of OpenSRF versions + Evergreen versions
>
> For #2, it's easy to build many different Evergreen branches against a
> single version of OpenSRF that has been installed on a given server, but it
> gets a lot more complex to properly test different versions of OpenSRF +
> different versions of Evergreen on a single server; you get into having
> to give the build slave the appropriate permissions to run 'make
> install' and teaching it how to uninstall OpenSRF absolutely cleanly to
> avoid leaving any old Perl modules or shared libraries or headers around
> that you don't want polluting your clean environment. Given the elevated
> permissions that would give the build slave, and the complexity of
> getting the OpenSRF uninstall right, in the short term I think we would
> be better off just installing a known version of OpenSRF (a mix of 1.6.2
> and perhaps 2.0 prereleases) on the intended Evergreen build slaves and
> focusing on the Evergreen build results on those.
>
> The build master server that Equinox contributed (thank you!) is running
> Ubuntu Lucid x86_64, and is also being used as a build slave to test
> OpenSRF branches (currently just trunk, but I will extend that to test
> rel_2_0 and rel_1_6 in the near future).
>
> So - are there community members able to contribute a server or two to
> the continuous integration cause? The requirements would be pretty low;
> all that these build slaves need to do once they're set up with a
> distro, the OpenSRF and/or Evergreen dependencies, and a buildbot slave
> instance is connect to the build master, check to see if any commits
> have been made to our repo, and if so then update the local source,
> configure, compile, and run our unit tests, then report the results back
> to the build master. I believe a VM with 16 GB of disk and 512 MB of RAM
> would be plenty. The VM should be generally firewalled off from the rest
> of the host's network, and incoming access could be limited to SSH so
> that the build slave's owner could update dependencies from time to time
> and restart the build slave process.
>
> I could see a strong incentive for sites that run on a particular distro
> wanting to ensure that Evergreen continues to get tested regularly on
> that distro, even if the devs go crazy and all switch to Fedora (ahem)
> for their day-to-day development purposes.
>
> If we don't want to absorb the overhead of coordinating machines at
> different institutions with different owners, etc, then another option
> would be to purchase base Linode VMs (http://www.linode.com) at
> $20/month/VM and give the CI team members (hah, hi) access to set up and
> maintain those servers; possibly financed via charitable donations to
> the Software Freedom Conservancy earmarked for this purpose once we have
> our signed agreement with the Conservancy? Or similar, I guess, for EC2
> instances or whatever (although it's out of my realm of experience,
> buildbot does provide an EC2 build slave that can provision AMIs on
> demand if we wanted to test that route - but then you're getting into
> AWS keys and credit cards and complexity of a less technical but
> possibly murky financial nature).
>
> Dan
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
-----------------------
F. Grant Johnson
Systems Manager - Robertson Library
email : fgjohnson at upei.ca, phone: 566-0630
cell: 393-4920
skype: jetsongeorge | twitter: fgjohnson | facebook: fgjohnson | blog:
granitize.blogspot.com
More information about the Open-ils-dev
mailing list