[OPEN-ILS-DEV] GSoC Proposition

[Mike Rylander]

I was actually thinking that the ui would only show one group/tag woth of
settings at a time, unlike the gmail inbox, and a dropdown would filter
this.  When the displayed group changes you'd be warned of unsaved edits, be
given a chance to save, and the fetch the selected group from the backend.

Sorry that wasn't clear.

--miker (from phone)

On Mar 30, 2011 10:48 AM, "Jason Boyer" <jasonb at myjclibrary.org> wrote:
>
> Do you mean that the same setting might be visible in more than one place
on the settings page? That seems like it would get confusing fast,
especially if changing it in one location didn't immediately update all of
the other instances. I think having a "settings group" field would be
helpful for building a better UI, but restricting a setting to 1 group would
be easier for admins (who are not necessarily software developers or
database admins!) to use, and for software devs/db admins to implement.
That's the way the labels work in Gmail, and precious few people here
understand how that all works. (And Google did eventually have to add a
"Move To" button for users, which just dumbs them back down to simple
1-label-per-email "folders" ...)
>
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason Boyer, IT Specialist
> Jackson County Public Library
> 303 W Second St
> Seymour, IN 47274
>
> jasonb at myjclibrary.org
> p (812) 522-3412 ext. 227
> f (812) 522-5456
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Mike Rylander <mrylander at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Joseph Lewis <joehms22 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I have posted a draft here of what I plan to do (if I'm accepted)
during
>> > GSoC for you all, if you could reply with some comments that would be
great:
>> >
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1z-LX9O9BDzMZwuwMDz6dZ_7CjdRuXUmIlwU9qExrwJI
>> >
>>
>> Thanks, Joe.
>>
>> A further idea that is perhaps worth evaluation is the addition of
>> "tagging" to settings for the purpose of grouping them into logical
>> sets.  This would be a many-to-many relationship as opposed to a
>> simple many-to-one grouping as settings may be usefully viewed in more
>> than one context.  This would increase the complexity of the task by
>> involving more layers (in the least, database changes) and therefore
>> may be less appropriate for a GSoC project (IMO, it's still quite
>> do-able), but would pay large dividends in terms of flexibility and
>> future maintenance if the UI was driven primarily by settings-grouping
>> tags.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Rylander
>>  | VP, Research and Design
>>  | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
>>  | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>>  | email:  miker at esilibrary.com
>>  | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20110330/5b2900a6/attachment.htm