[OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

[Dan Wells]

I'm fine with the decision and consensus, but want to add one thing.  I've met a fair number of users who have a difficult time managing multiple windows in an ongoing way (call them "the closers").  We obviously don't have any such folks responding to this thread, but I think we should be open to such feedback (should it come) and possibly reconsider this decision if necessary.

Dan


Daniel Wells
Library Programmer/Analyst
Hekman Library, Calvin College
616.526.7133

From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Bill Erickson
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:20 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Cc: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration


Agreed on "fleshing out modules on a workflow-by-workflow basis as much as possible".  This is one area where user testing early in the process can really pay off.

So, I think it's safe to say we have a consensus on avoiding the XUL/mixed integration path entirely.  From a development perspective, this is certainly a relief.

-b

--
Bill Erickson
| Senior Software Developer
| phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: berick at esilibrary.com<mailto:berick at esilibrary.com>
| web: http://esilibrary.com
| Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20140407/b13fb717/attachment.htm>