[OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback request / integration

[Tim Spindler]

Maybe this was said but if the web interface is not incorporated in the
xulrunner client, would the old screens continue to be available in the
xulrunner client?

Tim Spindler
C/W MARS


On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:12 PM, McCanna, Terran <
tmccanna at georgialibraries.org> wrote:

> Every system has a few. "The Closers" is fantastic. For our users, I plan
> on recommending that the staff members that have trouble switching back and
> forth and that are intimidated by the new interface should just stick with
> the existing staff client when they are busy and practice using the web
> interface when they are not so busy until they get used to it. Any sort of
> change is going to require a certain amount of training, and I feel that
> this approach gives libraries more control over how and when they get their
> staff up to speed.
>
> And, depending on how workflow is set up at a branch, sometimes you will
> find yourself doing a simple repeated task over and over a hundred times
> and there won't be a lot of switching back and forth (checking in books
> from a holiday weekend, routing holds, etc.)
>
>
>
>
> Terran McCanna
> PINES Program Manager
> Georgia Public Library Service
> 1800 Century Place, Suite 150
> Atlanta, GA 30345
> 404-235-7138
> tmccanna at georgialibraries.org
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Wells" <dbw2 at calvin.edu>
> To: "Evergreen Development Discussion List" <
> open-ils-dev at list.georgialibraries.org>, "Evergreen Discussion Group" <
> open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 5:32:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback
> request / integration
>
>
>
>
> I'm fine with the decision and consensus, but want to add one thing. I've
> met a fair number of users who have a difficult time managing multiple
> windows in an ongoing way (call them "the closers"). We obviously don't
> have any such folks responding to this thread, but I think we should be
> open to such feedback (should it come) and possibly reconsider this
> decision if necessary.
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Wells
>
> Library Programmer/Analyst
>
> Hekman Library, Calvin College
>
> 616.526.7133
>
>
>
> From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:
> open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Bill Erickson
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:20 PM
> To: Evergreen Discussion Group
> Cc: Evergreen Development Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] browser staff feedback
> request / integration
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Agreed on "fleshing out modules on a workflow-by-workflow basis as much as
> possible". This is one area where user testing early in the process can
> really pay off.
>
>
>
>
>
> So, I think it's safe to say we have a consensus on avoiding the XUL/mixed
> integration path entirely. From a development perspective, this is
> certainly a relief.
>
>
>
>
>
> -b
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Bill Erickson
>
>
> | Senior Software Developer
>
>
> | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>
>
> | email: berick at esilibrary.com
>
>
> | web: http://esilibrary.com
>
>
> | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
>
>
>


-- 
Tim Spindler
tjspindler at gmail.com

*P**   Go Green - **Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless it's
really necessary.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-dev/attachments/20140407/1fdce7ef/attachment.htm>