[OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] DIG Meeting Follow-up

[Yamil Suarez]

I second everything Robert said at this point.

Yamil


On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:00 PM, open-ils-documentation-request at list.georgialibraries.org 
  wrote:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:35:31 -0400
> From: "Soulliere, Robert" <robert.soulliere at mohawkcollege.ca>
> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] DIG Meeting Follow-up
> To: Documentation discussion for Evergreen software
> 	<open-ils-documentation at list.georgialibraries.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<CEA75392DDDF7B479A1D4D5BB73FF1D212C31F674B at MCFE-140-EX001.mc.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> My comments on these questions:
>
> 1) What are our current priorities as far as documentation goes?
>
> #1: Fill in the content gaps for 2.0 as indicated by outline/ 
> assignments:
> http://open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=evergreen-docs_2.0:outline
> - a lot of pretty big gaps still exist especially in regards to new  
> OPAC features and some common staff tasks. Is there some existing  
> documentation for in the wild people could share or review for  
> inclusion?
>
> #2: More reviewing and reviewers for existing documentation for 2.0  
> to find flaws, verify accuracy and improve procedures.
>
> #3: Begin developing documentation for 2.1 (and discover what can be  
> pulled from 2.0).
>
>
> 2) Is there anything DIG itself needs (as opposed the documentation)  
> that might deserve some priority?
>
> - 2.1 test server to allow more folks a test platform for new 2.1  
> features -- Yamil brought this up at the DIG meeting.
>
> Regards,
> Robert
>
>
>
> Robert Soulliere, BA (Hons), MLIS
> Systems Librarian
> Mohawk College Library
> robert.soulliere at mohawkcollege.ca
> Telephone: 905 575 1212 x3936
> Fax: 905 575 2011