[OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Including technical information in end-user docs

Tony Bandy tonyb at ohionet.org
Thu Aug 1 14:09:17 EDT 2013


Hi Kathy, folks,

(Speaking for myself, not my employer)

It would be nice to have everything in a single package.  Perhaps as an
appendix at the back labeled System Adminstration or something to that
affect.  But this is just my take, other folks might like a different
approach.

--Tony


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Kathy Lussier <klussier at masslnc.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This question came up during some recent discussions I had with Equinox
> regarding some documentation they were doing for one of our development
> projects, and it seemed like a topic that DIG might want to discuss. It
> relates to how much technical documentation should be included in the
> end-user docs that are created for a feature in Evergreen. In this case, it
> is a new feature, but I suppose the question relates to any functionality
> we want to document for Evergreen.
>
> We've seen documentation come in various forms when a new feature is
> introduced:
>
> * The release notes include a description of the new feature and, ideally,
> also include any new settings or permissions associated with the feature.
> * The docs include information for end users to use the new feature. It
> also sometimes contains information on settings and permissions.
> * There is also a TechRef directory that is available with the code that
> contains more technical information on some features.
>
> The question is how much technical information should be included in those
> end-user docs?
>
> My personal opinion is that any information in the Release Notes should
> also be included in the docs because there are many people who probably
> never look at the release notes. However, should end-user docs include
> information on library settings and permissions that are usually configured
> by the admin, not the end-user? Should a separate technical details section
> be included in the end-user docs?
>
> What structure do you think would work best for the community?
>
> Kathy
>
> --
> Kathy Lussier
> Project Coordinator
> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
> (508) 343-0128
> klussier at masslnc.org
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/**kmlussier<http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list
> OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.**georgialibraries.org<OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION at list.georgialibraries.org>
> http://list.georgialibraries.**org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-**
> documentation<http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation>
>



-- 
Tony Bandy
tonyb at ohionet.org
OHIONET
1500 West Lane Ave.
Columbus, OH  43221-3975
614-486-2966 x19
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-documentation/attachments/20130801/13f588d7/attachment.htm>


More information about the OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list