[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] forum?

[Nuku Ameyibor]

i think  some part of  the hold should be exposed to  the patron.this
would enable the patron  to see which other options they have .this
would offer the patron a lot of flexibility.but as i see it ,it
offers the patron  some level  of flexibilty but  i think it  just
isnt exposed to the patron .i  havent experimented  with it much but i
think  more flexibilty should be available on both sides as far as
possible.


i have another question though

 .i just installed the evergreen debian virtual image .i tried
unsueccsusefly to run it on macox but it wasnt working.i now have it
installed and running using  the vmware fusion on my mac. the problem
is that i need a staff client  for staff to be able to use the staff
version.the   openils.org site says that  the virtual image doesnt
work with the staff client.does anybody  have any ideas or
suggestions about  how i can run this??

On 5/5/09, Cathyk231 at aol.com <Cathyk231 at aol.com> wrote:
> Jason,
> Thank you for the speedy reply!  I suppose your reasons have valid  merit
> but then why can one system do this and not Greenleaf ...is my beef.   I
> don't care if it "shifty"....all I know is if I'm 3rd in line or 68 in line
> I
> can expect the length of wait.  Of course I was often pleasantly surprised
> to see a book become available when I was perhaps 20th in line....I don't
> cae...I just appreciate getting the book...whenever!
>
> The biggest benefit to the queue IMO is that I can reserve other lesser
> popular titles when I know I won't be flooded with too many others I've
> reserved.
>
> Again, thanks for your reply.
>
> BTW, is there a forum where I can read others' comments, questions,  etc.?
>
> Cathy
> **************Remember Mom this Mother's Day! Find a florist near you now.
> (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=florist&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000006)
>