[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] two quick questions about biblio.record_entry

[Duimovich, George]

For the first question, yes (see attached screen shot to see some of the
linkages that the record id has to other tables).
 
In regards to active = false -  I believe if the record is deleted, the
active flag gets set to 'false' - some copy related info is still
retained in the database (but also marked in the relevant table with
active =  false). This allows one to undelete a record later on.
 
George

________________________________

From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Jesse Ephraim
Sent: May 11, 2010 16:05
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] two quick questions about
biblio.record_entry



Two quick questions:

 

Is biblio.record_entry.id the unique number for a bib record?  I assume
it is, but wanted to double-check.

 

Does a "no" in biblio.record_entry.active mean that there is no item
attached to the bib record?

 

Thanks!

 

Jesse Ephraim

 

Director, Roanoke Public Library

308 S. Walnut

Roanoke, Texas 76262

(817) 491-2691

jephraim at roanoketexas.com

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20100511/407441fd/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: biblio.record_entry.id.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8653 bytes
Desc: biblio.record_entry.id.png
Url : http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20100511/407441fd/attachment-0001.png