[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Differences in documentation?

[Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich]

Hello, Tony.

I recently had a similar question regarding action trigger documentation: http://list.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/2012-August/007194.html.

Most likely, what you are observing is due to the process that was used to port existing documentation to future versions. If there was no volunteer to test/review and/or convert to Asciidoc a given section, documentation was not moved forward.

I think there was agreement to change that process. So, from now on all documentation will move forward and applied to the new version, even if it wasn't tested -- with an appropriate disclaimer, perhaps. The idea was that it would be better to have some documentation, even if it wasn't tested, then missing sections. See: http://www.mail-archive.com/open-ils-dev@list.georgialibraries.org/msg06806.html.

On Aug 23, 2012, at 08:43 , Tony Bandy wrote:

> Morning all,
> 
> If this has been discussed previously, please forgive me.....
> 
> Was looking in the documentation last night particularly from 1.6, Chap 25 (http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/1.6/draft/html/serveradministration.html) and was noticing that this branch was not present in the new 2.X series of information.  Any ideas or maybe I've just missed something?  Would Chap. 25 be actively considered as still valid for the 2.X series of Evergreen?
> 
> Feeling a bit guilty as I have not contributed to the docs group yet, but it's on my radar! :) 
> 
> 
> Tony
> 
> *******************************************
> Tony Bandy
> tonyb at ohionet.org
> OHIONET
> 1500 West Lane Ave.
> Columbus, OH  43221-3975
> 1-800-686-8975 x19
> ********************************************
> 
> 


Alexey Lazar
PALS
Information System Developer and Integrator
507-389-2907
http://www.mnpals.org/