[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Vandelay 2.2. question

[Mary Llewellyn]

Hi Kathy,

Thank you! That makes sense. I have some other set-up work to do before I'm
ready to test it. I may come knocking at your door with more questions as
our testing progresses.

Mary


-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Lussier [mailto:klussier at masslnc.org] 
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 4:02 PM
To: mllewell at biblio.org; 'Evergreen Discussion Group'
Subject: RE: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Vandelay 2.2. question

Hi Mary, 

I can answer your question about the 001 field. You need to make the 001
field a record attribute to match on it. You can do so by going to Server
Admin < MARC record attributes. I've attached a screenshot of the 001 record
attribute we set up when testing. 

Once you set up the record attribute, you can build a match set based on the
record attribute (you may need to first reboot the client). Instead of
selecting MARC tag and subfield when building your match set, click the
"record attribute" button. The new attribute you just created should be
available in the list.

I hope this helps!

Kathy

-------------------------------------------------------------
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 756-0172
(508) 755-3721 (fax)
klussier at masslnc.org
IM: kmlussier (AOL & Yahoo)
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
 
 

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open- 
>>ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Mary 
>>Llewellyn
>>Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 3:46 PM
>>To: open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org
>>Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Vandelay 2.2. question
>>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>We've just installed Evergreen 2.2 on a test server, and I'm starting 
>>to look at Vandelay's new features. The first problem I'm running into 
>>is trying to set up a Record Match set using tag 001 as a match point.
>>Tag 001 has no subfields, but the Working Match Point won't allow me 
>>to add a tag without a subfield. I've thought about using the OCLC 
>>number from tag 035, but that number has no "ocn" or "ocm" prefix, and 
>>I expect that may cause a problem if we hit some other system control 
>>number in that field. Similarly, I'd like to include values from tag
>>019 subfield a (Obsolete OCLC number) as a match point, but the 
>>presence/absence of the prefixes in those numbers may cause a problem, 
>>too.
>>
>>Any advice out there?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Mary
>>
>>Mary Llewellyn
>>
>>Database Manager
>>
>>Bibliomation, Inc.
>>
>>Middlebury, CT
>>
>>mllewell at biblio.org