[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Evergreen & Software Performance Analysis
Kathy Lussier
klussier at masslnc.org
Wed Feb 27 13:32:55 EST 2013
Hi Tim,
Sure, if there are specific steps taken where you routinely find system
performance/response times lacking, please add them to the list. This
could give us some ideas of areas that need to be evaluated. I would say
that falls within identifying specific "pain" points (not the "paint"
points that I sent in my original e-mail) that you see.
Kathy
Kathy Lussier
Project Coordinator
Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
(508) 343-0128
klussier at masslnc.org
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
On 2/27/2013 11:45 AM, Tim Spindler wrote:
> Kathy,
>
> Are do you want some information like workflows that seem slow? For
> instance, just got a report from a library about specific steps they
> are doing to catalogiing where certain individual processes are slow.
>
> Tim
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Kathy Lussier <klussier at masslnc.org
> <mailto:klussier at masslnc.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It was brought to my attention that everyone who may have some
> input for this discussion may not have an Evergreen wiki account.
> In that case, please feel free to send an e-mail (to the list, not
> directly to me) identifying any performance issues you believe
> should be addressed through a performance evaluation. I'll be
> happy to add them to the wiki.
>
> What I'm looking for is:
>
> 1. Any specific paint points you see in performance.
> 2. Any specific questions you think a performance evaluation
> should answer.
> 3. Any ideas you might already have regarding causes of
> performance problems. In reading through the logs from the "future
> of the staff client" meeting, I noticed several people said they
> thought it was important to bring these ideas together before
> reaching out to a consultant, and I agree that this is an
> important first step in the process.
>
> I posted just a few of our local issues at
> http://www.evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=dev:testing:performance_issues:
>
> STAFF CLIENT:
>
> Memory leaks - is there an inherent problem with the technology
> used in the staff client (xulrunner, Dojo) that is the source of
> the memory leak problem and other performance problems?
> Slow retrieval of patron records
>
> MESSAGING (OPENSRF):
> Staff client batch operations (e.g. updates/deletes from copy buckets)
>
> DATABASE:
> Catalog search - is there a way to optimize searching in the
> catalog so that users get faster results and are able to start
> re-implementing things like search.relevance_adjustment to provide
> boosts to relevance ranking?
>
> I'm quite sure there are far more pain points out there, so please
> don't feel shy about contributing to the list!
>
>
> Kathy
>
>
>
> Kathy Lussier
> Project Coordinator
> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
> (508) 343-0128 <tel:%28508%29%20343-0128>
> klussier at masslnc.org <mailto:klussier at masslnc.org>
> Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>
> On 2/25/2013 11:44 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Having heard no objections to proceeding with finding somebody to
>> do a software performance analysis, I have created a page on the
>> wiki at
>> http://www.open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=dev:testing:performance_issues
>> where we can identify the pain points that need further
>> evaluation and add any questions that we hope a performance
>> analysis might be able to answer.
>>
>> I have started the list off with some basic issues/questions that
>> have come up in our own systems. During the future of the staff
>> client meeting, Dan Scott had mentioned that there might be three
>> points of attack:client, opensrf, database. I thought dividing
>> the list into those three areas might be a good way to start.
>>
>> I'm hoping that all the knowledgeable sys admins out there who
>> have a stronger understanding of the system architecture than I
>> do can build this list into something that might be a good
>> starting point for any performance evaluation, whether it's done
>> by a third party or by somebody in the Evergreen community. By
>> identifying the questions we hope a performance evaluation might
>> answer, we are also identifying what our expectations are before
>> we enter the process. I would want to be clear on our
>> expectations before formally talking to any third party so that
>> we can be fully informed about whether an evaluation could meet
>> those expectations.
>>
>> Kathy
>>
>>
>> Kathy Lussier
>> Project Coordinator
>> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
>> (508) 343-0128 <tel:%28508%29%20343-0128>
>> klussier at masslnc.org <mailto:klussier at masslnc.org>
>> Twitter:http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
>> On 2/20/2013 2:26 PM, Mike Rylander wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Kathy Lussier
>>> <klussier at masslnc.org <mailto:klussier at masslnc.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I wasn't sure if I should add this to the QA discussion, but
>>> it seemed worthy of its own thread.
>>>
>>> During the "future of the staff client" meeting, I advocated
>>> for bringing in a consultant to do a software performance
>>> analysis for Evergreen to help us identify where the
>>> critical bottlenecks are in the system in the hopes that we
>>> could then identify the areas that need to be worked on to
>>> improve performance. At the time, I didn't have any concrete
>>> suggestions on finding a consultant who could take on this
>>> project, but I have since done some more investigation and
>>> have a couple of leads, the most promising of which is an
>>> individual local to Massachusetts who previously worked for
>>> many years at Stratus Technologies where he was involved in
>>> all levels of performance analysis. He now teaches
>>> graduate-level courses on performance evaluation and also
>>> does contract work.
>>>
>>> Now that I actually have concrete leads, I would like to get
>>> the ball rolling, provided there is support from the larger
>>> community. I'm not quite sure how this might fit in with
>>> ESI's planned QA efforts or with the possibility of bringing
>>> in a firm like OmniTI as Dan suggested, but my reading into
>>> these QA e-mails is that the focus would be on testing new
>>> commits.
>>>
>>>
>>> I want to clarify something that Dan seems to have assumed
>>> incorrectly: that anything ESI does is mutually exclusive with
>>> bringing in outside expertise. Nobody has any grounds to stop
>>> such an effort, and it would be ridiculous to argue otherwise,
>>> words put into my mouth notwithstanding. The initial focus of
>>> an ESI effort will be what exists today, through infrastructure,
>>> so that what exists tomorrow can then be tested.
>>>
>>> As for how it would fit in, ESI would absorb and internalize any
>>> advice or direction, just like any other community member, and
>>> work within the community to incorporate that.
>>>
>>> So, why have ESI involved at all? Besides the fact that we
>>> create a significant portion of the code, and that it benefits
>>> us as much as anyone to have a more stable Evergreen, there is a
>>> need for ongoing, active leadership in QA. The fact is that it
>>> has not materialized yet, so we're looking for a way to make
>>> that a maintainable proposition for the community's benefit.
>>> That means ongoing, deep integration with both developer and
>>> user communities. And that is not something that we can expect
>>> from OmniTI or any other organization that is not plugged into
>>> those communities. Could some other organization step into that
>>> role, and provide years of ongoing QA support? Perhaps so, but
>>> ESI exists today and has the Evergreen expertise needed to avoid
>>> long (and costly) ramp-up time.
>>>
>>> The point is this, though, ESI will encourage any effort to
>>> improve Evergreen, and is willing and able to work in the
>>> community, as we always do, to further those efforts.
>>> Thanks, Kathy!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Rylander
>>> | Director of Research and Development
>>> | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
>>> | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
>>> | email: miker at esilibrary.com <mailto:miker at esilibrary.com>
>>> | web: http://www.esilibrary.com
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Tim Spindler
> tjspindler at gmail.com <mailto:tjspindler at gmail.com>
>
> *P** Go Green - **Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless
> it's really necessary.*
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20130227/065a9a0d/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list