[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] JSPAC removal blockers, what and which are they?

[Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich]

Sure!

I have to admit I was a bit bummed to see checking for password strength rank so low on the results list.

Also, toggling font size seems like duplication of browser functionality. I am not sure why people think it is useful at all to have on a web page. From observations of user behavior in the past, it seems like people who need larger fonts know how to increase font size in the browser, and usually do all their browsing with the increased font size, rather than adjusting each page/website separately.

Aleksey


On 2013-01-11, at 12:29 , Justin Hopkins <justin at mobiusconsortium.org> wrote:

> Thanks for doing that Alexy!
> 
> Regards,
> Justin Hopkins
> Manager, Information Technology
> MOBIUS Consortium Office
> c: 573-808-2309
> 
> --sent from a mobile device--
> 
> On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:22 AM, "Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich"
> <alexey.lazar at mnsu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Hello.
>> 
>> I took the averages of the responses for each bug/feature and ranked them. This is what the result looks like:
>> 
>> 1. Copy Location Search when scoped to a particular org unit - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084732
>> 2. Public copy notes - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1013817
>> 3. Bib records without copies appear to patrons in the OPAC. Bib records without copies do not appear in a gray band in the staff client so that staff know that these records do not have copies. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084753
>> 4. Metarecord searching (aka "group formats and editions") - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084740
>> 5. Search Range - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084742
>> 6. Some added content components have not been re-integrated
>> 7. Metarecord holds - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1053397
>> 8. Spell check - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084734
>> 9. Authority browse: should be added as a new tab in advanced search. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1000957
>> 10. Toggle to increase/decrease font size - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1084758
>> 11. Rewrites from JSPAC to TPAC to preserve old links going to new interfaces.
>> 12. Widget-based access to all configured search indexes
>> 13. Accurate links from RSS feeds/unapi display - the dynamic details link from the unapi display continues to go to the jspac record. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1089479
>> 14. Check for password strength at login and force change if password is weak - https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1013786
>> 15. Advertise OpenSearch so that users can automatically add a search widget for the catalog to their browser.
>> 
>> My CSV file attached.
>> 
>> Aleksey
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2013-01-11, at 10:34 , "Peters, Michael" <MRPeters at library.IN.gov> wrote:
>> 
>>> Good morning, all.
>>> 
>>> Attached you will find the results of the JSPAC blocker survey.  Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Michael Peters
>>> Indiana State Library MIS | Inspire.IN.gov Helpdesk | Evergreen Indiana Helpdesk
>>> office - 317.234.2128
>>> email - mrpeters at library.in.gov
>>> 
>>> From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Peters, Michael
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 8:15 PM
>>> To: Evergreen Development Discussion List; Evergreen Discussion Group
>>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] JSPAC removal blockers, what and which are they?
>>> 
>>> Just 11 responses so far today, so I don't think anyone will flood the vote ;)
>>> 
>>> I will be out all next week but will try and find a time to save off the spreadsheet and send it to the list.
>>> 
>>> -Mike
>>> 
>>> From: open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open-ils-dev-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Rogan Hamby
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:13 PM
>>> To: Evergreen Discussion Group
>>> Cc: Evergreen Development Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] JSPAC removal blockers, what and which are they?
>>> 
>>> So long as no one tries to rig the vote I don't think there is a big danger.  If multiple staff in a consortium are involved in the community, are aware of it and respond I think that is right.
>>> 
>>> Now, if I were to say broadcast the form around SCLENDS and get everyone to respond to it to never watches the mailing lists and has no idea what the PACs are that's wrong.  I swear to not do that by the way despite living formative years in Miami Dade where there is a long tradition of the dead voting.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Sharp, Chris <csharp at georgialibraries.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Yamil,
>>> 
>>> I don't see any reason to limit voting.  I think this poll is meant to be a "finger on the pulse" type measure rather than anything officially binding.  One of my GPLS colleagues and I have already voted and she and I probably don't even have the same perspective on the ranking, for instance.  I think as broad a net as possible will indicate people's overall preferences.
>>> 
>>> Just my two cents!
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Yamil Suarez" <ysuarez at berklee.edu>
>>>> To: "Evergreen Development Discussion List" <open-ils-dev at list.georgialibraries.org>
>>>> Cc: "Evergreen Discussion Group" <OPEN-ILS-GENERAL at list.georgialibraries.org>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:34:07 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] [OPEN-ILS-DEV] JSPAC removal blockers,        what and which are they?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Should we limit our votes to one vote per consortium/system/branch,
>>>> or
>>>> should we have an extra field stating if we are voting as an
>>>> individual or representing an institution?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for putting this all together,
>>>> Yamil
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 20, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Peters, Michael wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> As Mike R suggested, I've created a simple Google form where you
>>>>> can
>>>>> rank the 15 "missing" features from 1 to 15, with "1" being the
>>>>> most
>>>>> important feature to your organization.  We'll give everyone some
>>>>> time to rank these, then average the values to find the rankings of
>>>>> importance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dHNXYVpXZ3NtWnFoYWN1RlN0TThIOEE6MQ
>>>>> 
>>>>> Enjoy!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Mike Peters
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Chris Sharp
>>> PINES System Administrator
>>> Georgia Public Library Service
>>> 1800 Century Place, Suite 150
>>> Atlanta, Georgia 30345
>>> (404) 235-7147
>>> csharp at georgialibraries.org
>>> http://pines.georgialibraries.org/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> ----------------------------
>>> Rogan Hamby
>>> Headquarters Manager, York County Library System
>>> 
>>> "You can never get a cup of tea large enough or a book long enough to suit me."
>>> -- C.S. Lewis
>>> <JSPAC Features Missing from TPAC - Sheet1.csv>
>> 
>> Aleksey Lazar
>> PALS
>> IS Developer and Intergrator
>> 507-389-2907
>> http://www.pals.org/
>> alexey.lazar at mnsu.edu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <JSPAC Features Missing from TPAC - Sheet1_RANKED_lazar.csv>

Aleksey Lazar
PALS
IS Developer and Intergrator
507-389-2907
http://www.pals.org/
alexey.lazar at mnsu.edu