[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Vandelay and multiple volume bib records

[Donald Butterworth]

Bill,

My thinking is that the vol.2 needs to show up in the Part Designation
subfield not the Call Number field. Is that not right?

Don


On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Bill Erickson <berick at esilibrary.com>wrote:

> Hi Don,
>
> With this setup, you would ultimately get a copy with call number "BV176.G37
> 1999vol.2".  Is that what you're going for or is there something else you
> expect/want to happen?
>
> -b
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Donald Butterworth <
> don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu> wrote:
>
>> Acquisitions Gurus,
>>
>> The scenario.
>> I have a bibliographic record that describes a two volume set.
>> We are purchasing just volume 2 of the set.
>> We are using a the 962 field to supply Order and copy data to Evergreen.
>>
>> The question.
>> Is it possible to supply the volume information so that it creates a
>> correct copy record?
>> Would adding the volume to the call number accomplish this?
>>
>> Example.
>> =962  \\$aBV176.G37 1999vol.2
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>> --
>> Don Butterworth
>> Faculty Associate / Librarian III
>> B.L. Fisher Library
>> Asbury Theological Seminary
>> don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu
>> (859) 858-2227
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Erickson
> | Senior Software Developer
> | phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
> | email: berick at esilibrary.com
> | web: http://esilibrary.com
> | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
>
>


-- 
Don Butterworth
Faculty Associate / Librarian III
B.L. Fisher Library
Asbury Theological Seminary
don.butterworth at asburyseminary.edu
(859) 858-2227
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20130722/1fab8b23/attachment-0001.htm>