[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Anyone using Custom Org Unit Tree
Tina Ji (Project Sitka)
tji at sitka.bclibraries.ca
Tue Apr 1 15:17:09 EDT 2014
Hi all,
We are facing the following scenario. We wonder whether the Custom Org
Unit Tree will help.
SYS1 and SYS2 do not share their collections, meaning no holds allowed
on each other. Now BRA1 from SYS1 wants to share its collection with
all branches of SYS2, which means collection of BRA1 should show up
when a search is scoped to SYS2. For some reason, it is not desired to
move BRA1 to SYS2 on the org unit tree.
We tried the Custom Org Unit Tree. We made BRA1 under SYS2, same as
the other branches in SYS2. BRA1 showed up on the OPAC as a branch in
the search location list (and the hold pickup library list). But it
seems for 'display' only. When a search is scoped to SYS2, titles, of
which only BRA1 has copies, are not returned on the result list. We
also tried to hide an org unit from the Custom Tree, but its holdings
keep showing up on the holdings grid.
I wonder anyone is using the Custom Org Unit Tree. Can you shed some
light on how it works?
Other issues on my radar includes how custom tree interacts with the
Org Unit Hiding Depth on the Library Settings Editor, and the OUs in
circ_ and hold_matrix_matchpoints. We do not use Strict OU matches.
Thank you
Tina Ji
1-888-848-9250
Trainer/Help Desk Specialist
BC Libraries Cooperative/Sitka
More information about the Open-ils-general
mailing list