[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Anyone using Custom Org Unit Tree

Tina Ji (Project Sitka) tji at sitka.bclibraries.ca
Tue Apr 1 15:17:09 EDT 2014


Hi all,

We are facing the following scenario. We wonder whether the Custom Org  
Unit Tree will help.

SYS1 and SYS2 do not share their collections, meaning no holds allowed  
on each other. Now BRA1 from SYS1 wants to share its collection with  
all branches of SYS2, which means collection of BRA1 should show up  
when a search is scoped to SYS2. For some reason, it is not desired to  
move BRA1 to SYS2 on the org unit tree.

We tried the Custom Org Unit Tree. We made BRA1 under SYS2, same as  
the other branches in SYS2. BRA1 showed up on the OPAC as a branch in  
the search location list (and the hold pickup library list). But it  
seems for 'display' only. When a search is scoped to SYS2, titles, of  
which only BRA1 has copies, are not returned on the result list. We  
also tried to hide an org unit from the Custom Tree, but its holdings  
keep showing up on the holdings grid.

I wonder anyone is using the Custom Org Unit Tree. Can you shed some  
light on how it works?

Other issues on my radar includes how custom tree interacts with the  
Org Unit Hiding Depth on the Library Settings Editor, and the OUs in  
circ_ and hold_matrix_matchpoints. We do not use Strict OU matches.

Thank you

Tina Ji
1-888-848-9250
Trainer/Help Desk Specialist
BC Libraries Cooperative/Sitka




More information about the Open-ils-general mailing list