[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Reminder: Deadline is TODAY for 2.6 alpha targeting [RM2.6]

Liam Whalen liam.whalen at bc.libraries.coop
Thu Jan 16 13:07:52 EST 2014

Hi Dan,

I have a few improvements to the staff client that I am still testing internally, but I plan to push them into 2.6 at some point.  Would it be best to create launchpad bugs for them now?

Liam Whalen
BC Libraries Cooperative - Sitka
Systems Specialist
855-383-5761 x1022
liam.whalen at bc.libraries.coop

On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Dan Wells <dbw2 at calvin.edu> wrote:

> Hello all,
> Just a quick reminder that today is the last day to target bugs for inclusion in 2.6 alpha.  As in past releases, new features will still be permitted until beta, which is scheduled for early February.  That said, the sooner something is ready and targeted, the more likely it will be reviewed and included in 2.6, so please don’t miss this opportunity to get some attention for your branch.
> Here is the current list of bug reports in the 2.6.0-alpha1 milestone which also have pullrequest tags:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&field.milestone%3Alist=62053&field.tag=pullrequest&field.tags_combinator=ANY&search=Search&orderby=id&start=0
> This is the list which I am asking reviewers focus on over the next few days, but as you can see, the list is relatively small.  In contrast, here is a list of *all* un-committed pullrequests:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&assignee_option=any&field.tag=pullrequest&field.tags_combinator=ANY&search=Search&orderby=-milestone&memo=75&start=0&direction=backwards
> I couldn’t figure out a way to exclude the items already targeted at 2.6 (the first list), but I was able to sort them to the bottom.  As you can see, we (at the time of this writing) have 70+ pullrequests which are either targeted only at old branches or not targeted at all.  Many of these are stale and should probably be invalidated, but many others should rightly be targeted at 2.6.  If you are able, please take some time today to review the second list, and apply the 2.6.0-alpha1 milestone (or invalidate) as you deem appropriate.
> As always, please reply to this thread if you have any questions or concerns.
> Thank you,
> Dan
> Daniel Wells
> Library Programmer/Analyst
> Hekman Library, Calvin College
> 616.526.7133

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20140116/3f57987f/attachment.htm>

More information about the Open-ils-general mailing list