[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Wish list items from the Cataloging Interest Group meeting Evergreen 2014.

[Hardy, Elaine]

Elizabeth,

Could you please add this to the Launchpad reports: 

https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297909
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297833


Thanks!

Elaine

J. Elaine Hardy
PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Ste 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304

404.235-7128
404.235-7201, fax
ehardy at georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org
www.georgialibraries.org/pines


-----Original Message-----
From: open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Elizabeth Thomsen
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 1:27 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Wish list items from the Cataloging
Interest Group meeting Evergreen 2014.

I'd like a way to have both local bib fields and local copy notes.

For example, when searching within the context of a particular library,
you might want to have local notes related to the author's affiliation
(faculty or alumni author, local author, etc.), contents or subject matter
(Chapter 10 includes several photographs of parks and buildings in X town)
-- things that are specifically important to one library but that belong
at the bib level because they are true of all copies.

Local copy notes would be used for things that are only true of a
particular copy -- restriction, donor, autographs, etc.

--
Elizabeth Thomsen, Member Services Manager
NOBLE: North of Boston Library Exchange
26 Cherry Hill Drive
Danvers Massachusetts 01923
E-mail: et at noblenet.org

On Wed, March 26, 2014 11:40 am, Sarah Childs wrote:
> I have just added a somewhat related wishlist bug for improving the 
> Copy Notes function. Curious to know if others would find these 
> improvements would alleviate the need to publicly display local notes 
> in MARC.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297909
>
> ---
> Sarah Childs
> Technical Services Department Head
> Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library
> 250 North Fifth Street
> Zionsville, IN 46077
> 317-873-3149 x13330
> sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us
>
> On 2014-03-26 09:11, Hardy, Elaine wrote:
>> I have added several wish list items we discussed during the 
>> cataloging interest group meeting held at this year's Evergreen 
>> International Conference. They are:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Link to Edit MARC in record summary
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297833
>>
>>
>>
>> In the record summary, in addition to links for Add Volumes and View 
>> MARC, add a link to Edit MARC. Access to the link would be controlled 
>> by permissions so that if user did not have permission to edit a MARC 
>> record the link would be "grayed" out and not functional for them. 
>> This would allow catalogers to access Edit MARC functionality more 
>> quickly and improve workflow.
>>
>>
>>
>> MARC tag/field edit permissions
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297836
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Within MARC Edit, the ability to set permissions by MARC tag/field so 
>> that a library could assign editing tasks for a specific field to an 
>> individual user. For example, allowing a user to edit only the 300 
>> field in the MARC record and not be able to edit any other field.
>>
>>
>>
>> In addition to being controlled by permissions, the ability to allow 
>> specific tag/field edits should also be a library or server setting 
>> so that a library or consortium can allow or disallow the 
>> functionality as a whole.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ability to display notes in public facing OPAC by specific library
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1297838
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In library consortia, local notes (e.g. 590s) specific to an 
>> individual library's copy/item is not generally allowed. We would 
>> like the ability to make local notes in the MARC bibliographic record 
>> display in OPAC searches scoped to the specific library. We envision 
>> this to be similar to the
>> |9
>> in 856 fields whereby coding within the field creates local notes 
>> that would then display only to the system or branch indicated in the 
>> field.
>> This would also be valuable to other note fields as well. For 
>> example, where different libraries have different use and 
>> reproduction rights that could be indicated in a 540 note scoped for 
>> an individual library.
>> These
>> notes would be repeatable with in the MARC bibliographic record.
>>
>>
>>
>> For those of you that requested or supported the wish list items, 
>> please take a moment to add to the Launchpad report, whether to 
>> clarify your request or to add that it effects you. If you did not 
>> request the report, please login and do the same, or let us know 
>> where there may be problems with the request we did not foresee in 
>> our discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please also let me know if I missed a discussion item you would like 
>> to add as a wish list or bug fix.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Elaine
>>
>> J. Elaine Hardy
>> PINES & Collaborative Projects Manager Georgia Public Library Service
>> 1800 Century Place, Ste 150
>> Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
>>
>> 404.235-7128
>> 404.235-7201, fax
>> ehardy at georgialibraries.org
>> www.georgialibraries.org
>> www.georgialibraries.org/pines
>