[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Browse Indexes - 710

[Blake Henderson]

Jim,

We had this same issue. Be design, the mods32 xlst from LOC contains 
this line:

<xsl:for-each select="marc:datafield[@tag='700']​ 
[not(marc:subfield[@code='t'])]">

(we addressed the 700 instead of the 710 but the solution is probably 
the same)

We updated that line in the xlst to:

<xsl:for-each select="marc:datafield[@ta​g='700'][marc:subfield[not 
(@code='t')]]">

This makes it match the stock Evergreen indexes even with the presence 
of the subfield "t".

Furthermore, we wanted to include the 700t in our title index. So we 
created an index:

INSERT INTO config.metabib_field ( field_class, name, label, format, 
xpath, search_field, authority_xpath, browse_field, browse_sort_xpath ) 
VALUES ('title', 'alternative_700t','Title Alternative (700t)', 
'marcxml', $$//marc:datafield[@tag='700']/marc:subfield[@code="t"]$$, 
TRUE, null, TRUE, null);

Hope this helps!

-Blake-
Conducting Magic
MOBIUS
573-234-4513
877-312-3517

On 10/8/2015 4:23 PM, Jim Taylor wrote:
>
> I am wondering if there is anyone using the Browse Indexes and, if so, 
> have you verified that the 710’s with a subfield “t” and without (they 
> are handled differently) are working.  As far as I can tell they will 
> not work as configured in Evergreen right out of the box.   I have 
> gotten the 710, without a “t”, to work, with a little tweaking, but 
> still no luck with the 710 with a “t”.      I am reasonably sure this 
> isn’t limited to the 710’s but am working down the list trying to make 
> sure all the indexes are working and are configured correctly and this 
> is the current problem.
>
> So, if, *you know*, your 710 browse indexes work and you are willing 
> to share the mod32 xslt  from the config.xml_transform table I would 
> greatly appreciate it. Unless you know of some other reason the 
> indexes aren’t working by default…I supposed Evergreen could be 
> configured by default to not have the 710’s work but that doesn’t seem 
> likely since they are part of the mod2 transformation and the index 
> configuration seems appropriate???
>
> In any event, any information that could point me in the right 
> direction would be appreciated.  Thank you.
>
> Jim
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20151008/3b66da03/attachment.html>