[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

Mon May 9 14:06:00 EDT 2016

I’ll chime in, too, as a relative newcomer -

IRC was completely new to me three years ago, but I found it easy to learn the more “advanced” ins-and-outs (because there’s really nothing to learn when all you want to do is ask a question) . I like being able to hop on using any browser or program I want, with nothing to install, anytime I’ve needed to.

Sadly, I cannot say the same for any of the fancier meeting platforms. Most webinars I’ve used on these platforms require 15 minutes at the beginning of the session to explain how to chat/alert/etc, and there is usually someone who can’t connect to one or more parts. I have found myself in those situations, and I consider myself quite tech-savvy.

I love the simplicity (and yes, antiquity) of the IRC interface! (And there are many other benefits, as already stated)

-Holly

Holly Brennan
Technology Specialist
Homer Public Library

hbrennan at cityofhomer-ak.gov
907-435-3154 (direct)
907-235-3180 (main desk)

From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Chris Sharp
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 9:46 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

A couple of pro-IRC points to consider as well:
- conversations are publicly logged and web-searchable
- despite the apparent intimidation factor for new users (mitigated by sessions like Yamil so generously offers), it's a low point of entry
- can accommodate hundreds (or thousands) of users who can participate in real time, making meetings truly public (the most I've seen teleconferencing software accommodate is maybe 15, increasing costs for whoever is hosting the meeting)
I'm open to individual committees or the Evergreen Oversight Board occasionally using conference software for a more face-to-face feel, but I hope we will continue using IRC for most community business for the above reasons (and the ones Ben mentioned).
Just my two cents,
Chris

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ben Shum <ben at evergreener.net<mailto:ben at evergreener.net>> wrote:

It's a reasonable question and one we should continue to evaluate over time.

One reason we did not always like products like gotomeeting, etc. was cost. While community volunteers could grant access to their organizations resources, the community itself never decided to spend money on platforms. Freenode IRC is free to use.

Another reason is cross platform compatibility; some of us used Linux workstations and these did not always play nicely with those applications.

After this many years on IRC, it's second nature to me, but I also see the value considering alternative solutions if we can work through all the logistics and continue to keep barriers of access to a minimum.

-- Ben

Sent from my Nexus 6
On May 9, 2016 12:01 PM, "scott.thomas at sparkpa.org<mailto:scott.thomas at sparkpa.org>" <scott.thomas at sparkpa.org<mailto:scott.thomas at sparkpa.org>> wrote:
I’d like to ask a general question about this since I am still fairly new to the community. Why has the Evergreen community opted to use IRC chat as an on-line meeting venue? The one time I used it I found it disconcerting in its antiquated look and feel and had difficulty with the etiquette. Why not use GoToMeeting, Blackboard Collaborate, or a similar product? The chat interface in these products is much closer to what most of us are used to and it would add in the possibility of using VOIP and screen sharing. I’ve been curious about this for a while....

Scott

Scott Thomas
Executive Director
PaILS / SPARK
(717) 873-9461<tel:%28717%29%20873-9461>
scott.thomas at sparkpa.org<mailto:scott.thomas at sparkpa.org>
[Description: Description: Training | SPARK – Pennsylvania's Statewide Library System]<http://www.palibrary.org/pails/>

From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org>] On Behalf Of Barbara Cormack
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:46 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general at list.georgialibraries.org>>
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

I second what Stuart said; I'd be interested.  Thanks! -- Barbara

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Forrest, Stuart <sforrest at bcgov.net<mailto:sforrest at bcgov.net>> wrote:
Yes please I missed the last one

Stuart

From: Open-ils-general [mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general-bounces at list.georgialibraries.org>] On Behalf Of Yamil Suarez
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 11:59 AM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Should we schedule another IRC practice time?

Hello,

Last week the IRC practice time went well, and we had a good bunch of folks trying out IRC. I wanted to check in if there was interest for a second practice time. I am all for it, but I wanted to verify that there was community interest. Remember to include your colleagues that are not on this list that may want to learn.

I tend to pick times after 12 noon EST to allow those on the west coast to join, but I am willing to schedule something in the (east coast) morning too.

Thanks in advance,
Yamil

--
Barbara Cormack
Project Manager
Equinox Software - Open Your Library
1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
barbara at esilibrary.com<mailto:barbara at esilibrary.com>
www.esilibrary.com<http://www.esilibrary.com>

--
Chris Sharp
PINES System Administrator
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, Georgia 30345
(404) 235-7147
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20160509/6151c90f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1491 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20160509/6151c90f/attachment-0001.jpg>