[OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] metabib.browse_entry unused cleanup?

Bill Erickson berickxx at gmail.com
Mon Apr 2 16:30:58 EDT 2018


Hi Josh,

I clean these up about once a year.  It's never been a problem, though.  I
just like cleaning things.

-b

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Josh Stompro <stomproj at exchange.larl.org>
wrote:

> Hello, I’ve been changing around some indexing rules and applied the fix
> to the full stop/rda relator code normalization issue and now just noticed
> that all the no longer used browse entries are sticking around in
> metabib.browse_entry.
>
>
>
> There are 175K entries out of 950K that are no longer used according to
> metabib.browse_entry_def_map and metabib.browse_entry_simple_heading_map.
>
>
>
> Has anyone found this to be an issue and removed those unused entries?  I
> don’t think this is causing any issues, it just seems strange to hold on to
> that data.  Any typo that was ever entered in a browse field and corrected
> is recorded there.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Josh
>
>
>
> Lake Agassiz Regional Library - Moorhead MN larl.org
>
> Josh Stompro     | Office 218.233.3757 EXT-139 <(218)%20233-3757>
>
> LARL IT Director | Cell 218.790.2110 <(218)%20790-2110>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://libmail.georgialibraries.org/pipermail/open-ils-general/attachments/20180402/585a988d/attachment.html>


More information about the Open-ils-general mailing list