[Opensrf-commits] r1942 - in trunk: include/opensrf src/libopensrf (scottmk)
svn at svn.open-ils.org
svn at svn.open-ils.org
Mon Mar 22 16:56:02 EDT 2010
Author: scottmk
Date: 2010-03-22 16:55:56 -0400 (Mon, 22 Mar 2010)
New Revision: 1942
Modified:
trunk/include/opensrf/osrf_message.h
trunk/src/libopensrf/osrf_message.c
Log:
Apply the const qualifier to the return value from osrfMessageGetResult().
M include/opensrf/osrf_message.h
M src/libopensrf/osrf_message.c
Modified: trunk/include/opensrf/osrf_message.h
===================================================================
--- trunk/include/opensrf/osrf_message.h 2010-03-22 19:46:09 UTC (rev 1941)
+++ trunk/include/opensrf/osrf_message.h 2010-03-22 20:55:56 UTC (rev 1942)
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
void osrf_message_add_param( osrfMessage*, const char* param_string );
-jsonObject* osrfMessageGetResult( osrfMessage* msg );
+const jsonObject* osrfMessageGetResult( osrfMessage* msg );
char* osrfMessageSerializeBatch( osrfMessage* msgs [], int count );
Modified: trunk/src/libopensrf/osrf_message.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/src/libopensrf/osrf_message.c 2010-03-22 19:46:09 UTC (rev 1941)
+++ trunk/src/libopensrf/osrf_message.c 2010-03-22 20:55:56 UTC (rev 1942)
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@
The returned pointer points into the innards of the osrfMessage. The calling code should
@em not call jsonObjectFree() on it, because the osrfMessage still owns it.
*/
-jsonObject* osrfMessageGetResult( osrfMessage* msg ) {
+const jsonObject* osrfMessageGetResult( osrfMessage* msg ) {
if(msg) return msg->_result_content;
return NULL;
}
More information about the opensrf-commits
mailing list