[Eg-oversight-board] Fwd: [Evergreen-governance-l] Evergreen Oversight Board minutes, 6-21-11

[Dan Scott]

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Mike Rylander <mrylander at gmail.com> wrote:
> I read through the draft minutes and noticed that Galen Charlton was
> mentioned several times, once in a seemingly participatory role, but was not
> listed as present at the top. Was that an oversight or did I simply misread
> the minutes?

He was able to join the call just as the call was adjourning, but
effectively wasn't part of the discussions during the 2011-06-21
meeting.

Galen had provided input prior to the meeting via email (the reference
to the paragraph he supplied was an action item that was triggered by
Bradley Kuhn's email to the Board upon joining the Conservancy), and
of course was invaluable throughout the entire month (he took the bull
by the horns in coordinating the Evergreen / SFC announcement, for
example). So we can't help but mention Galen!

> Thanks, folks, for getting the minutes out quickly.  It's important that the
> rest of the community see what happens inside the group we've charged with
> representing the rest of us.

Agreed!

> --miker
>
> On Jun 26, 2011 8:02 AM, "Dan Scott" <dan at coffeecode.net> wrote:
>> And of course I should have CCed
>> eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org - not
>> @list.georgialibraries.org. Apologies for the confusion.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Dan Scott <dan at coffeecode.net>
>> Date: Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:42 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Evergreen-governance-l] Evergreen Oversight Board minutes,
>> 6-21-11
>> To: Amy Terlaga <terlaga at biblio.org>
>> Cc: eg-oversight-board at list.georgialibraries.org,
>> evergreen at sfconservancy.org
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Amy Terlaga <terlaga at biblio.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all—
>>>
>>> I didn’t think the new list was ready so here are the minutes from last
>>> Tuesday’s meeting.
>>>
>>> Elizabeth took a pass at edits, but if you have any corrections just let
>>> me
>>> know.
>>
>> Thanks Amy, these are very thorough! I've converted these to AsciiDoc
>> format and pushed them into the governance git repository
>> (http://git.evergreen-ils.org/?p=contrib/governance.git;a=tree;f=minutes)
>> - I've also CCed the evergreen at sfconservancy.org address to ensure the
>> Conservancy is in the loop (although I guess I'm risking people
>> getting duplicates of this message - hrm...)
>>
>> Please find attached the AsciiDoc text source format, along with HTML
>> and PDF representations.
>>
>> I made a few minor changes while editing this:
>>
>>  * Called out specific action items in *BOLD* - this should make it
>> easier to follow up on things we said we would do
>>  * Included links to relevant emails for Stephen Wills' Conflict of
>> Interest item and my motion
>>  * Included the full text of the motion I put forth to excise the
>> vestigial mention of the Treasurer from the Rules of Governance
>>
>> There are other areas that I noted in passing probably need some
>> massaging, but I'll leave that to a separate email. Once we're happy
>> with the minutes, I'll publish them on the Governance wiki page at
>> http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=governance:structure
>>
>> Dan
>