[Eg-oversight-board] Swag!

[Amy Terlaga]

While we're on the subject of tweaking, Ben here tells me that there's a shortened version of the logo (just the leaf against a circular background) that would lend itself better to some forms of merchandise.

Is this an approved version of the logo, does anyone know?  Can it be used or do we have to use the full EVERGREEN?

And how can I get digital copies of these once we have the official and approved version(s)?

Amy

+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Amy Terlaga
Assistant Director, User Services
Bibliomation, Inc.
32 Crest Road
Middlebury, CT  06762
203-577-4070 x101
www.biblio.org


-----Original Message-----
From: McKinney, Elizabeth [mailto:emckinney at georgialibraries.org] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:03 PM
To: Lori Bowen Ayre
Cc: eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org; evergreen at sfconservancy.org
Subject: Re: [Eg-oversight-board] Swag!


I agree with Dan on being hesitant to change the logo.  However, I seem to remember the green color being difficult to work with. Lori, do you think the website team would want to tweak the green a bit before we proceed?

Hurray for swag! 

Elizabeth McKinney
PINES Program Director
Georgia Public Library Service
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta GA 30345
404.235.7141
emckinney at georgialibraries.org
http://www.georgialibraries.org/





----- Original Message -----
From: "Lori Bowen Ayre" <lori.ayre at galecia.com>
To: "Rogan Hamby" <rogan.hamby at gmail.com>
Cc: eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org, evergreen at sfconservancy.org
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:48:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Eg-oversight-board] Swag!


If no interest in changing the logo in any way, fine by me. Go forward with swag! 




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 

Lori Bowen Ayre //
Library Technology Consultant / The Galecia Group
(707) 763-6869 // Lori.Ayre at galecia.com 

Availability: http://doodle.com/loriayre 


Specializing in open source software solutions, RFID, filtering, workflow optimization, and materials handling 

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 


On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Rogan Hamby < rogan.hamby at gmail.com > wrote: 


My recollection (and again no citation) is vague but I think the discussion centered around merchandising opportunities. 

My opinion is that if you change a logo just to change it ... well, you dilute it's purpose. Unless someone came up with an amazing design that had huge advantages I don't think it would be worthwhile. 
With that said, if someone was really passionate about this I'd let them come up with proposals and consider them (even if my gut feeling is that it's a waste of time and the odds of my being proven wrong on this are slim). But, it doesn't seem that anyone is passionate. 
We're groping around for the resources. We seem to be doing it because once upon a time it was discussed. I've been happy to let the conversation lapse into non-existence and would be glad to do so again. 




On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Corridan, Jim (ICPR) < jcorridan at icpr.in.gov > wrote: 
> I would tend to agree with Dan. 
> 
> Jim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Scott [mailto: dan at coffeecode.net ]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:49 AM
> To: Kathy Lussier
> Cc: Lori Bowen Ayre; Galen Charlton; 
> eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org ; < 
> evergreen at sfconservancy.org >
> Subject: Re: [Eg-oversight-board] Swag! 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 09:48:50AM -0500, Kathy Lussier wrote: 
>> Hi Lori,
>> 
>> I wasn't a member of the Board when the idea to redesign the logo was 
>> first raised and only came in at the tail end of the discussion when 
>> some logos were passed around at the meeting in Indianapolis.
>> Could somebody give me some background on why we were considering a 
>> new logo? I've been involved in re-branding efforts before, but 
>> they've typically happened when a logo has become dated, stale, or 
>> sometimes just plain ugly. I've always found the current logo to be 
>> clean,simple, and effective at identifying the Evergreen product.
>> 
>> I'm not necessarily opposed to change, but just curious about the 
>> previous discussions I missed. I'm also hoping a logo redesign 
>> doesn't delay any efforts to have some swag available in time for 
>> this year's conference. I'm anxious to buy all sorts of Evergreen 
>> stuff for the family! :)
> 
> Thanks for raising this, Kathy. For what it's worth, I am opposed to 
> change when it comes to changing a brand that has been established 
> over more than 6 years, unless there's a really good reason for it 
> (for example, if the logo is offensive to some cultural group, or of 
> questionable copyright status). And I'm not sure that such a reason 
> has been expressed to date.


> _______________________________________________ 
> eg-oversight-board mailing list 
> eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org 
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eg-oversight-board 


_______________________________________________
eg-oversight-board mailing list
eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eg-oversight-board