[Eg-oversight-board] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Code of conduct for Evergreen events

[Rogan Hamby]

I have no objection to including it.

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 16, 2014, at 12:33 PM, Kathy Lussier <klussier at masslnc.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm forwarding along some feedback from the SFC that we received on the proposed code of conduct.
> 
> Kathy
> 
> Kathy Lussier
> Project Coordinator
> Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative
> (508) 343-0128
> klussier at masslnc.org
> Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:	Re: Fwd: Code of conduct for Evergreen events
> Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:57:48 -0400
> From:	Tony Sebro <tony at sfconservancy.org>
> To:	Kathy Lussier <klussier at masslnc.org>
> CC:	bkuhn at sfconservancy.org <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org>, Ben Hyman <ben.hyman at bc.libraries.coop>
> 
>> On 04/16/2014 11:46 AM, Kathy Lussier wrote:
>> Did you have an opportunity to review the below policy that Galen sent along last month?
> Hi, Kathy.
> 
> I'm fine with the policy as-is.  However, I do like the definition of "harassment" used in the OpenStack Summit Code of Conduct [1], which was in turn based on the PyCon Code of Conduct:
>> What Constitutes Harassment
>> 
>> Violent threats, intimidation or personal insults directed against another person
>> Verbal, graphic or written comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race or religion
>> Posting sexually explicit or violent material
>> Stalking or following, including harassing photography or recording
>> Sustained disruption of talks or other presentations
>> Inappropriate physical contact or sexual attention
>> Posting (or threatening to post) other people's personally identifying information
>> Advocating for, or encouraging, any of the above behavior
>> Repeated harassment of others. In general, if someone asks you to stop, then stop
> I recommend incorporating that definition into the Evergreen Event Code of Conduct.  It's available for use under a CC By license.  But, if the EOB doesn't want that level of specificity with respect to defining "harrassment," I'm fine with approving the code of conduct as-written.
> 
> Best, -Tony
> 
> [1] http://www.openstack.org/summit/openstack-summit-hong-kong-2013/the-openstack-summit-code-of-conduct/
> -- 
> Tony Sebro, General Counsel, Software Freedom Conservancy
> +1-212-461-3245 x11
> tony at sfconservancy.org
> www.sfconservancy.org 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eg-oversight-board mailing list
> eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eg-oversight-board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/attachments/20140416/89d27d50/attachment.html>