[Eg-oversight-board] Officer Elections next week

Ruth Frasur rfrasur at gmail.com
Sun Apr 10 07:06:25 EDT 2016


All sounds good to me on this.  I have a few things going on during this
time frame, but will make a point of keeping email checking on the schedule.

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Yamil Suarez <ysuarez at berklee.edu> wrote:

> Grace,
>
> My apologies, but I have a couple of questions. Though, I should be
> available by email next week.
>
> Since my term is ending, it is OK for me to vote on the future officers or
> do I need abstain?
>
> Instead of nominating specific persons for the officer positions, I guess
> that you will load all the members whose terms are not expiring for the
> chair position? Then everyone except the chair-elect for the vice chair
> vote?
>
> Thanks,
> Yamil
>
> On Apr 8, 2016, at 3:41 PM, Amy Terlaga <terlaga at biblio.org> wrote:
>
> >This will require the EOB to be available to check email several times
> per day Monday-Thursday next week.  Will this be problematic for anyone?
>
> Grace, I should be able to do this.
>
> Amy
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Grace Dunbar <gdunbar at esilibrary.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> As the EOB elections wind down this week (I just sent a reminder to the
>> few people who registered but haven't voted yet), we need to look ahead to
>> officer elections.
>>
>> There is nothing specific in the governance rules regarding how officers
>> must be nominated and elected.  Unless I hear an objection, I'd like to
>> proceed with nominations and voting next week.
>>
>> Tentatively, I'd like to propose nominations for Chair on Monday with
>> voting Tuesday. Nominations for Vice-Chair will be Tuesday with voting
>> Wednesday, and nominations for Secretary will be Wednesday with voting on
>> Thursday.  This will require the EOB to be available to check email several
>> times per day Monday-Thursday next week.  Will this be problematic for
>> anyone?
>>
>> The section on the representative to the SFC is, frankly, a little vague.
>> (See section 2.5b <https://evergreen-ils.org/governance/>)  It just
>> says, "One Board member shall be the official representative to the Fiscal
>> Sponsor."  The position is not included with the officer structure - it is,
>> however, something that the SFC requires, one official point of contact for
>> our project.  In the past the role has been assigned to officers and
>> non-officers pretty much equally.  But since this is not an officer
>> position in and of itself, I believe we can wait and assign/elect the rep
>> at the Evergreen conference meeting.  Thoughts?
>>
>> For the record I had planned to use OpaVote for our vote recording for
>> the officer elections unless I hear any objections...
>>
>> Thanks everyone!
>> Grace
>>
>> --
>> Grace Dunbar, Vice President
>> Equinox - Open Your Library
>> gdunbar at esilibrary.com
>> 1-877-OPEN-ILS  |  www.esilibrary.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eg-oversight-board mailing list
>> eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org
>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eg-oversight-board
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
> Amy Terlaga
> Director of Member Services
> Bibliomation, Inc.
> 24 Wooster Avenue
> Waterbury, CT  06708
> (203)577-4070 x101
> terlaga at biblio.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> eg-oversight-board mailing list
> eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eg-oversight-board
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eg-oversight-board mailing list
> eg-oversight-board at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eg-oversight-board
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/eg-oversight-board/attachments/20160410/67338846/attachment.html>


More information about the eg-oversight-board mailing list