[Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

[Elizabeth McLean]

Hi Mary,

Thanks for the information. It is not in MARC Record Attributes. I will pass this on to our Admin. Is there anything special they need to know about setting this up?

Libby

From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of Mary Llewellyn
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 12:13 PM
To: 'Evergreen Community Catalogers'
Subject: Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

We have trouble with using the OCLC record attribute as a match point, though I do see it as choice in setting up the Record Match Set.  I'm told we'll need to re-ingest our database for our older records to be included with that OCLC number matchpoint. That's on our to-do list.

I'm not sure why you don't see it as a choice for the Record Match Set. Have you looked at Admin/Server Administration/MARC Record Attributes to verify it is still there?

Mary

From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org<mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org> [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth McLean
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:44 PM
To: 'Evergreen Community Catalogers'
Subject: Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

We are testing Vandelay features in 2.2 now and I would like to know if anyone has successfully used the 001 field as a match point for overlays and could share their experience. During testing last year I thought OCLC Number (aka 001) had been set up set up as Record Attribute but I don't see it in the drop-down menu.

Thank you,

Libby McLean
King County Library System
lmclean at kcls.org<mailto:lmclean at kcls.org>
425-369-3345

From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org<mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org> [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org]<mailto:[mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org]> On Behalf Of Mary Llewellyn
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 1:15 PM
To: 'Evergreen Community Catalogers'
Subject: Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

Hi Libby,

Well, darn. I am trying to match against older records.

Thanks so much. I can stop beating my head against the wall now.

Mary


From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org<mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org> [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth McLean
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 3:23 PM
To: Evergreen Community Catalogers
Subject: Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

Hi Mary,

I haven't been able to test myself this since last summer, but I save this thread from an exchange between Kathy Lussier and Bill E about setting up the 001.

Bill said: "Note, though, without re-indexing existing records, the attribute will only work for incoming records or records added/edited after I created the configuration."

Libby McLean
Cataloging Librarian II
King County Library System
lmclean at kcls.org<mailto:lmclean at kcls.org>

From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org<mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org> [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org]<mailto:[mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org]> On Behalf Of Mary Llewellyn
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11:14 AM
To: Evergreen Community Catalogers
Subject: [Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

Hi all,

I've been working with the record match set, and want to use tag 001 as a match point. Because there's no subfield in that tag, I followed advice and set up a Record Attribute Definition for that tag, to use that attribute in the record match set. But I think I've missed something, because the loader isn't using the tag as a match point.

For the Record Atttribute Definition, I entered the MARC Tag value as 001. I left the MARC subfield field blank. I've also tried it with a % hoping it would act as a wild card. But in any load I do that would only match on tag 001, the match fails.

What have I missed?

Thanks,

Mary



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20120822/3d82d19b/attachment.html>