[Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

[Elizabeth McLean]

Hi Mary,

I haven't been able to test myself this since last summer, but I save this thread from an exchange between Kathy Lussier and Bill E about setting up the 001.

Bill said: "Note, though, without re-indexing existing records, the attribute will only work for incoming records or records added/edited after I created the configuration."

Libby McLean
Cataloging Librarian II
King County Library System
lmclean at kcls.org<mailto:lmclean at kcls.org>

From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of Mary Llewellyn
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11:14 AM
To: Evergreen Community Catalogers
Subject: [Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

Hi all,

I've been working with the record match set, and want to use tag 001 as a match point. Because there's no subfield in that tag, I followed advice and set up a Record Attribute Definition for that tag, to use that attribute in the record match set. But I think I've missed something, because the loader isn't using the tag as a match point.

For the Record Atttribute Definition, I entered the MARC Tag value as 001. I left the MARC subfield field blank. I've also tried it with a % hoping it would act as a wild card. But in any load I do that would only match on tag 001, the match fails.

What have I missed?

Thanks,

Mary



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20120608/95a2404a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Kathy Lussier <klussier at masslnc.org>
Subject: FW: 001 field {ESI16425}
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:32:12 +0000
Size: 8334
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20120608/95a2404a/attachment.mht>