[Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

[Mary Llewellyn]

Hi Libby,

 

Well, darn. I am trying to match against older records. 

 

Thanks so much. I can stop beating my head against the wall now.

 

Mary

 

 

From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org
[mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of
Elizabeth McLean
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 3:23 PM
To: Evergreen Community Catalogers
Subject: Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

 

Hi Mary,

 

I haven't been able to test myself this since last summer, but I save this
thread from an exchange between Kathy Lussier and Bill E about setting up
the 001.

 

Bill said: "Note, though, without re-indexing existing records, the
attribute will only work for incoming records or records added/edited after
I created the configuration."

 

Libby McLean

Cataloging Librarian II

King County Library System

lmclean at kcls.org

 

From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org
[mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of
Mary Llewellyn
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11:14 AM
To: Evergreen Community Catalogers
Subject: [Evergreen-catalogers] Record match set question

 

Hi all,

 

I've been working with the record match set, and want to use tag 001 as a
match point. Because there's no subfield in that tag, I followed advice and
set up a Record Attribute Definition for that tag, to use that attribute in
the record match set. But I think I've missed something, because the loader
isn't using the tag as a match point.

 

For the Record Atttribute Definition, I entered the MARC Tag value as 001. I
left the MARC subfield field blank. I've also tried it with a % hoping it
would act as a wild card. But in any load I do that would only match on tag
001, the match fails. 

 

What have I missed?

 

Thanks,

 

Mary

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20120608/63e27272/attachment-0001.html>