[Evergreen-catalogers] Conference discussion: wish list for cataloging

[Hardy, Elaine]

I found some of my notes :

 

Development issues discussed at CIG meeting:

 

.         Linking between headings and authority record

.         "See also" searching

 

.         Ability to batch bib records into buckets

 

.         Highly configurable spine label printing with ability to use
templates for any printer type

 

.         Better/more efficient deletion of volumes, copies, records

 

.         Copy notes: add multiple at same time; group/batch edit;
searchable; more accessible/visible; separate circ and cat permission for
editing.

.         Merging and overlay records: ability to check fields to retain
in target record.

 

These are just a few of the things we discussed. I thought I had recorded
more that these few, so I may have notes in another place.... 

 

 

Elaine 

 

 

J. Elaine Hardy

PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager

Georgia Public Library Service,

A Unit of the University System of Georgia

1800 Century Place, Suite 150

Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304

404.235-7128

404.235-7201, fax

 

 <mailto:ehardy at georgialibraries.org> ehardy at georgialibraries.org

 <http://www.georgialibraries.org/> www.georgialibraries.org

 <http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/>
http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/

 

 

From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org
[mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of
Mary Llewellyn
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:56 AM
To: Evergreen Community Catalogers
Subject: [Evergreen-catalogers] Conference discussion: wish list for
cataloging

 

Hi all,

 

I was wondering if anyone has a list of the topics that were discussed as
wishlist items at the Cataloging Workgroup at the 2012 conference? I'm
sure we have people in this email group who were unable to attend, and
would like to offer an opinion, or add ideas of their own to the list.

 

I'll start with the idea near and dear to my heart: a way to allow
restricted access to editing the MARC record, based on permission by tag.
In other words, being able to allow someone to edit tag 300 to add
pagination to a CIP record, but not allow them to make changes to tag 245.

 

Related to that is the idea of record ownership so that if a library owned
a particular record created for local purposes (something that our
consortium would not be adding to OCLC), they could add or enter any tag
on their record. An example for us would be a library that  lends museum
passes and would like them to show in the catalog. Right now, we have to
create that record for them in Evergreen; we'd like to be able to turn
that over to them without giving them the ability to edit the records we
downloaded from OCLC.

 

My two cents,

 

Mary

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20120529/8a07c110/attachment.html>