[Evergreen-catalogers] New RDA 264 field for Production, Publication, Distribution, Manufacture, and Copyright Notice

[sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us]

I was planning to send a similar question to this list. We haven't
made any decisions in how to handle the 264 field.

I agree with you that I'd like the 264 to be treated in the same
manner as the 260 field, and I'd like to see the 33X fields
indexed as well.

Discussing needed development for RDA was one of the reasons this
listserv was created. It's time to look hard at what's needed and
start prioritizing.


Sarah Childs
Senior Cataloger
Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library
250 North Fifth Street
Zionsville, IN 46077
317-873-3149 x13330
sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us


> Hello,
>
>
>
> We've started to see OCLC RDA records with the new 264 fields
> replacing the 260 field this week. (Information in field 264 is
> similar to information in field 260). What are other Evergreen
> libraries planning to do with this new field as you add records to
> your catalog? Are you changing the 264 fields to 260 fields to
> accommodate Evergreen's indexing and display capabilities?
> Ideally, we would like to index and display information from this
> field as well as make use of the other new RDA-specific 336, 337,
> and 338 fields.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Libby McLean
>
> King County Library
>
> lmclean at kcls.org<mailto:lmclean at kcls.org>
>
>
>
> This is an example from OCLC #780479984
>
> [cid:image001.png at 01CDA21C.1DF9DA30]
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>