[Evergreen-catalogers] New RDA 264 field for Production, Publication, Distribution, Manufacture, and Copyright Notice

[Mary Llewellyn]

I agree, we'll need to index the 264 and the 33x. I'd like to see the 33x
tags developed as search filters. 

-----Original Message-----
From: evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org
[mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of
sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 1:38 PM
To: Evergreen Community Catalogers
Subject: Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] New RDA 264 field for Production,
Publication, Distribution, Manufacture, and Copyright Notice

I was planning to send a similar question to this list. We haven't made any
decisions in how to handle the 264 field.

I agree with you that I'd like the 264 to be treated in the same manner as
the 260 field, and I'd like to see the 33X fields indexed as well.

Discussing needed development for RDA was one of the reasons this listserv
was created. It's time to look hard at what's needed and start prioritizing.


Sarah Childs
Senior Cataloger
Hussey-Mayfield Memorial Public Library
250 North Fifth Street
Zionsville, IN 46077
317-873-3149 x13330
sarahc at zionsville.lib.in.us


> Hello,
>
>
>
> We've started to see OCLC RDA records with the new 264 fields 
> replacing the 260 field this week. (Information in field 264 is 
> similar to information in field 260). What are other Evergreen 
> libraries planning to do with this new field as you add records to 
> your catalog? Are you changing the 264 fields to 260 fields to 
> accommodate Evergreen's indexing and display capabilities?
> Ideally, we would like to index and display information from this 
> field as well as make use of the other new RDA-specific 336, 337, and 
> 338 fields.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Libby McLean
>
> King County Library
>
> lmclean at kcls.org<mailto:lmclean at kcls.org>
>
>
>
> This is an example from OCLC #780479984
>
> [cid:image001.png at 01CDA21C.1DF9DA30]
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catal
> ogers
>




_______________________________________________
Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers