[Evergreen-catalogers] RDA marc fields

[Elaine Hardy]

As a general rule, don't delete legitimate fields unless they break
something or cause a lot of confusion. In Evergreen, there is no need to
delete fields that support RDA.

J. Elaine Hardy, PINES and Collaborative Projects Manager
------------------------------

Georgia Public Library Service

1800 Century Place, Suite 580 | Atlanta, GA 30345

(404) 235-7128 | ehardy at georgialibraries.org

(404) 548-4241 | Cell

<https://www.facebook.com/georgialibraries>
<https://www.twitter.com/georgialibs>

Join our email list <http://georgialibraries.org/subscription> for stories
of Georgia libraries making an impact in our communities.


On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:22 PM Glen Modell <modellg at aadl.org> wrote:

> Hello, this is Glen at the Ann Arbor District Library.  We've been live
> with Evergreen for just over a year, and I have a question from one of our
> cataloguers.  Formerly, we deleted RDA fields from MARC records because our
> previous system couldn't handle them.  But we are not seeing problems with
> RDA fields in Evergreen, so we'd like to leave those fields in.  Does
> anyone know of a reason we shouldn't keep them?  Thanks.
>
> *****************************
> Glen Modell
> Library Automation Specialist
> Ann Arbor District Library
> modellg at aadl.org
> 734-327-8322
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20190206/b8a84205/attachment.html>