[Evergreen-catalogers] RDA marc fields

[Rogan Hamby]

The future of RDA is still a bit uncertain in some particulars but overall
but I suspect you'll regret not keeping them if you don't.



On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:20 AM Mary Llewellyn <mllewell at biblio.org> wrote:

>
> We keep ours. In fact we're using tag 347 for MP3s to create a custom
> index for OPAC searching.
>
> Mary
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:22 PM Glen Modell <modellg at aadl.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello, this is Glen at the Ann Arbor District Library.  We've been live
>> with Evergreen for just over a year, and I have a question from one of our
>> cataloguers.  Formerly, we deleted RDA fields from MARC records because our
>> previous system couldn't handle them.  But we are not seeing problems with
>> RDA fields in Evergreen, so we'd like to leave those fields in.  Does
>> anyone know of a reason we shouldn't keep them?  Thanks.
>>
>> *****************************
>> Glen Modell
>> Library Automation Specialist
>> Ann Arbor District Library
>> modellg at aadl.org
>> 734-327-8322
>> _______________________________________________
>> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
>> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
>>
>> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>>
>
>
> --
> Mary Llewellyn
> Database Manager
> Bibliomation, Inc.
> 24 Wooster Ave.
> Waterbury, CT 06708
> mllewell at biblio.org
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20190206/d3165e04/attachment-0001.html>