[Evergreen-catalogers] Monograph Parts in the new Angular catalog

Carissa Malmgren CMalmgren at roanoketexas.com
Wed Oct 16 13:13:11 EDT 2019


I've submitted the bug report for this, so if this treatment of monograph parts in the Angular catalog sounds good, or if you want to add to the discussion, give some heat to bug 1848268!

Thanks for the feedback and discussion on this! :)

Carissa Malmgren
Cataloger
Roanoke Public Library

Pronouns: she/her/hers

-----Original Message-----
From: Evergreen-catalogers [mailto:evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org] On Behalf Of Jane Sandberg
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 4:23 PM
To: Evergreen Community Catalogers <evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>
Subject: Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] Monograph Parts in the new Angular catalog

This looks good to me, Carissa.  Thanks for bringing this issue forward.

My only comment: before a developer starts working on this, we should clarify exactly when the "12 of 12 parts" language kicks in.  Is it as soon as there are some monograph parts attached to the record in the Monograph Parts tab?  Does at least one item have to associated with a part?  Do all items have to be associated with parts?  What about when multiple bib records are combined in the Group Formats and Editions search?

If you already have good recommendations for these, they would be good to include in the bug report.  Otherwise, that might make an interesting discussion topic (either in the bug, or on this email list).  :-)

Thanks again,

   -Jane

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 1:54 PM Carissa Malmgren <CMalmgren at roanoketexas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> During the last CWG meeting, we got an awesome preview of the Angular staff catalog and discovered that monograph parts aren’t yet fully implemented. I said I’d create a bug report for this, but (since this is my first bug report) wanted to solicit some input before doing so. Does this work for a bug report? Is it a good/appropriate way to start this discussion?
>
>
>
> Monograph Parts Display/Description
>
>
>
> Currently (3.2.3), bib items with monograph parts are described in search results as having so many “copies” available. This makes it sound like a library has 12 copies of Futurama: The Complete Series available (rather than 12 parts of one copy available), and has been confusing for patrons and staff.
>
>
>
> Since monograph parts aren’t yet addressed at all in the new Angular catalog, I’m hoping this means we can implement/display/describe them more clearly.
>
>
>
> Can bib items with monograph parts be described as having “parts” (instead of “copies”) available?
>
>
>
> i.e.:
>
> Current:
>
> Futurama: the complete series (12 of 12 copies available)
>
>
>
> Proposed:
>
> Futurama: the complete series (12 of 12 parts available)
>
>
>
> I’ll attach screenshots to better illustrate what I mean.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Carissa Malmgren
>
> Cataloger
>
> Roanoke Public Library
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catal
> ogers



--
Jane Sandberg
Electronic Resources Librarian
Linn-Benton Community College
sandbej at linnbenton.edu / 541-917-4655
Pronouns: she/her/hers
_______________________________________________
Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers


More information about the Evergreen-catalogers mailing list