[Evergreen-catalogers] Date display in search list?
Chrisy Schroth
Chrisy.Schroth at kentonlibrary.org
Tue Jul 13 17:02:55 EDT 2021
I also prefer using the dates from the 260/264 field. That said, I remembered a bug I had investigated once related to this where we WERE talking about serial records, and finally found it in Launchpad.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1797207
This one is for the dates in the Record Summary, (vs the dates in the Search Results). In 2019 (3.2.4) Evergreen was pulling dates for the Record Summary with trailing - from the 260, but for records with a 264 it was pulling from the Fixed Field Date1, with no trailing punctuation or end dates.
Do we know if the pre-angular search results dates consistent in where they were pulled from, or was it also pulling from different locations when different fields were involved?
Thanks and have a great day!
Chrisy
Chrisy Schroth
Assistant Cataloger/Serials Coordinator
Kenton County Public Library
3095 Hulbert Avenue
Erlanger, KY 41018
859-578-7924 work
CHRISY.SCHROTH at KENTONLIBRARY.ORG
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D77808.C2A629A0]
From: Evergreen-catalogers <evergreen-catalogers-bounces at list.evergreen-ils.org> On Behalf Of Janet Schrader via Evergreen-catalogers
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 4:40 PM
To: Elaine Hardy <ehardy at georgialibraries.org>; Evergreen Community Catalogers <evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>
Subject: Re: [Evergreen-catalogers] Date display in search list?
Hi Elaine,
I prefer using the date displayed in the OPAC to be from the 264/260 field with the dash to indicate an open date. If that was already the case, wouldn't it be easier to put it back than create something new?
If the multi-date record were to pull from the fixed field, how would that affect serial records? Would the code also have to include DtSt is 'c' or 'd'?
Janet
[https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/bSd7D8g3VXi0D27vqlwdEBAUuPEYzFQNZVljNyCgRnefpl8eEyjF52SOpmhvBVlZ8DfMuAUvg24dRX1CG2tFVlm6VpHVAPOVJ4vho7b3jgZ--7YybCEFu-wJkv-y2Jg1dYKRYcLA]
Janet Schrader
Bibliographic Services Supervisor | CW MARS
67 Millbrook Street, Suite 201, Worcester, MA 01606
P: 508-755-3323 x 325 | F: 508-757-7801
________________________________
jschrader at cwmars.org<mailto:jschrader at cwmars.org> || http;//cwmars.org<http://www.cwmars.org/>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 4:21 PM Elaine Hardy via Evergreen-catalogers <evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org<mailto:evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>> wrote:
In the pre-angular catalog, open dates were displayed in the search result list as 1996- (I'm not sure if closed dates displayed as 1996-1998 or not). In angular (3.6) only the first date is displayed without the - if the date is open. Some of our catalogers used this 1996- format as a quick way to find a multivol record with similarly titled manifestations. On further investigation, I think that pre-angular may have been pulling from the 260/264 |c and that angular is populating it from the fixed field dates (08/07-14).
Before I open a launchpad report, I want to get the sense of the community about the best way to approach this. Is it better to ask for the date in the search results to be populated from the 260/264, as it appears? Or to remain from the fixed field with a wishlist request to use the DtSt - Type of date/publication status - to determine how the date(s) is displayed?
For example, if DtSt is m and Dates are 1996,1998 display as 1996-1998.
If DtSt is m and Dates are 1996,9999 display as 1996-
[https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/bpjlHkZIWY-VYFVLNA9ro5_6N4c7AxtzAPQhhzTKXaM1luxXME10aRo56LngwgoMXQ-OptUpmewQo8ljPZNpd7H2nZx09Xns4m_RVJ6D7NoWhha3cHDFxXExYWy2c7E0qfs3M5WC]
J. Elaine Hardy, PINES and Collaborative Projects Manager
________________________________
Georgia Public Library Service
2872 Woodcock Blvd., Suite 250 | Atlanta, GA 30341
(404) 235-7128 | ehardy at georgialibraries.org<mailto:ehardy at georgialibraries.org>
(404) 548-4241 | Cell
[https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/wjWdJl8zhUVb20FdmA0VXc4J9O5c0fKk1TTRabfYTrAZPyt8gtuVsgSIP_gPDaSD0mpvMRmzVxbpurZbyAzV1VrEHAKJUAZkUeSVH-CLb0KFkL6pHU_v09gN6QRKIRtUq1iR-Zbn]<https://www.facebook.com/georgialibraries> [https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/9dDBepVWGW2bIMC615q1KfmBTkk04sQENYf3r3X4IP5eYttphc5NQh1IZ4vsfVKxNeDquYf251jJKz3GP8Gs0LSo5nPIlC1gZsTcmFlhGRuaM0RSbHJXxpqqwAVJgjcKud5Jzgop] <https://www.twitter.com/georgialibs> [https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/qC0XM1vBNxEXGw_lKy9Mi0CItlEXSk42qcHTINcYfBgysbcUifEX39mTV0CvllVyEzZUU7Di1U3uQ4N5hKG7244DAaWAfZIxP3HldZONwuBMo1KdTdPe_5SUXG44S8MQvRFkWJcj] <https://www.instagram.com/georgialibraries/>
Join our email list<http://georgialibraries.org/subscription> for stories of Georgia libraries making an impact in our communities.
_______________________________________________
Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org<mailto:Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org>
http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20210713/a21ec494/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 32008 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20210713/a21ec494/attachment-0001.jpg>
More information about the Evergreen-catalogers
mailing list