[Evergreen-catalogers] Rename bibliographic record notes?

[Kate Coleman]

I like your train of thought here, Galen. Out of these options, I like
"record staff note" the best, but "workflow/process note" is a close
second.





On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:22 AM Galen Charlton via Evergreen-catalogers <
evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> While reviewing bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1978978, a
> question occurred to me: since the bibliographic record notes in question
> are trending towards being staff-only and are explicitly outside the MARC
> record, would it make sense to rename those notes to clarify their purpose?
>
> I'm thinking of options like:
>
> - record staff note
> - record workflow note
> - processing note
> - workflow/process note
>
> Regards,
>
> Galen
> --
> Galen Charlton
> Implementation and IT Manager
> Equinox Open Library Initiative
> gmc at equinoxOLI.org
> https://www.equinoxOLI.org
> phone: 877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
> direct: 770-709-5581
> <http://evergreen-ils.org>
> _______________________________________________
> Evergreen-catalogers mailing list
> Evergreen-catalogers at list.evergreen-ils.org
> http://list.evergreen-ils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/evergreen-catalogers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.evergreen-ils.org/pipermail/evergreen-catalogers/attachments/20221116/c864f1e6/attachment.htm>