[OPEN-ILS-DEV] staring down the barrel of opensrf 1.0

[Dan Scott]

On 07/12/2007, Dan Scott <denials at gmail.com> wrote:
> On licensing: are we sticking with a GPL v2 license for 1.0, or are we
> considering the possibilities of moving to GPL v3? 1.0 would be a
> natural time to make the switch; there are still a small enough number
> of contributors that rounding up sign-off could happen relatively
> quickly and easily. I'm not particularly concerned about GPL v2 vs.
> v3, in any case.

Related to licensing: we should also ensure that all OpenSRF files
have the standard comment header with accurate copyright statements
(adjusting Copyright 2005 to Copyright 2005-2007, for example) and
license boilerplate before 1.0 goes out.

-- 
Dan Scott
Laurentian University